Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38513020›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2024

Adaptive introgression of a visual preference gene.

Matteo Rossi, Alexander E Hausmann, Pepe Alcami, Markus Moest, Rodaria Roussou, Steven M Van Belleghem, Daniel Shane Wright, Chi-Yun Kuo, Daniela Lozano-Urrego, Arif Maulana and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
25.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetics and genomics of hybridization.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  2. Evolution of compound eye cell types shapes visual behaviors acrossbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rapid floral syndrome convergence inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Long-interval neurons are selective for slower pulse rates in chorus frogs that are sympatric versus allopatric with congeneric heterospecifics.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Emerging tools to advance neuroethology in butterflies and moths.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Cellular innovations and diversity in the lepidopteran compound eye.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Neuroethology on the move with butterflies and moths.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Linking individual fitness to the evolution of cognition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Matteo RossiFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9992-3355
Alexander E HausmannFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Pepe AlcamiFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1778-6743
Markus MoestDepartment of Ecology and Research Department for Limnology, Mondsee, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2370-2788
Rodaria RoussouFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Steven M Van BelleghemBiology Department, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9399-1007
Daniel Shane WrightFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4066-6718
Chi-Yun KuoFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8533-9358
Daniela Lozano-UrregoFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Arif MaulanaFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1968-4575
Lina Melo-FlórezFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4624-0224
Geraldine Rueda-MuñozFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Saoirse McMahonFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Mauricio LinaresFaculty of Natural Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Christof OsmanFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1892-0222
W Owen McMillanSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Gamboa, Panama.ORCID 0000-0003-2805-2745
Carolina Pardo-DiazFaculty of Natural Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-1183
Camilo SalazarFaculty of Natural Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-6588
Richard M MerrillFaculty of Biology, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4527-9298
LMU Klinikum · DESmithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAUniversidad del Rosario · COKU Leuven · BEUniversität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

European Research Council 851040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual preferences are important drivers of mate choice and sexual selection, but little is known of how they evolve at the genetic level. In this study, we took advantage of the diversity of bright warning patterns displayed by

Indexed as

ButterfliesCalcium-Binding ProteinsColor VisionGenes, InsectGenetic IntrogressionMating Preference, AnimalSexual SelectionAnimalsFemaleGenomeHybridization, GeneticCalcium-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID38513020
PMCPMC7616200
OpenAlexW4393035986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.