Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512858›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Late shellmound occupation in southern Brazil: A multi-proxy study of the Galheta IV archaeological site.

Jessica Mendes Cardoso, Fabiana Merencio, Ximena Villagran, Veronica Wesolowski, Renata Estevam, Benjamin T Fuller, Paulo DeBlasis, Simon Pierre-Gilson, Danaé Guiserix, Pauline Méjean and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jessica Mendes CardosoGéosciences Environnement Toulouse, Observatoire Midi Pyrénées, UMR 5563, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5087-0608
Fabiana MerencioMuseu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4848-9194
Ximena VillagranMuseu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8630-2015
Veronica WesolowskiMuseu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata EstevamMuseu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Benjamin T FullerGéosciences Environnement Toulouse, Observatoire Midi Pyrénées, UMR 5563, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1766-3161
Paulo DeBlasisMuseu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Simon Pierre-GilsonUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Danaé GuiserixÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Pauline MéjeanGéosciences Environnement Toulouse, Observatoire Midi Pyrénées, UMR 5563, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
Levy FigutiMuseu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Deisi FariasGrupo de Pesquisa em Educação Patrimonial e Arqueologia, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Tubarão, Brazil.
Geovan GuimaraesGrupo de Pesquisa em Educação Patrimonial e Arqueologia, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Tubarão, Brazil.
Andre StraussMuseu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Klervia JaouenGéosciences Environnement Toulouse, Observatoire Midi Pyrénées, UMR 5563, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina · BRÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon · FRUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazilian coastal archaeology is renowned for its numerous and large shellmounds (sambaquis), which had been continuously occupied from at least 8000 to 1000 years cal BP. However, changes in their structure and material culture in the late Holocene have led to different hypotheses concerning their ecological and cultural changes. The archaeological site Galheta IV (ca. 1300 to 500 years cal BP) offers new insights into the complexity of the late coastal occupation in southern Brazil. Our attempt was to determine whether Galheta IV can be classified as a sambaqui site, or if it belongs to a Southern proto-Jê settlement. Here, we reassessed Galheta's collections and applied a multi-proxy approach using: new 14C dates, zooarchaeology, δ13C and δ15N isotopes in bulk collagen and 87Sr/86Srenamel isotopic ratios from eight human individuals, ceramics analysis, and FTIR. The results indicate an intense exploitation of marine resources, with an area designated for processing animals located at the opposite side of the funerary areas. Bone tools and specific species of animals were found as burial accompaniments. No evidence of human cremations was detected. 87Sr/86Sr results indicate that the eight human individuals always lived on the coast, and did not come from the inland. The pottery analysis confirms the association with Itararé-Taquara, but contrary to what was assumed by previous studies, the pottery seems related to other coastal sites, and not to the highlands. In light of these findings, we propose that Galheta IV can be considered a funerary mound resulting from long and continuous interactions between shellmound and Southern proto-Jê populations. This study not only enhances our understanding of the late coastal occupation dynamics in southern Brazil but also underscores its importance in reshaping current interpretations of shellmound cultural changes over time.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyStrontium IsotopesAnimalsBrazilHumansStrontium-86Strontium-87Strontium Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID38512858
PMCPMC10956814
OpenAlexW4393057975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.