Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512772›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2024

Dynamical refinement with multipolar electron scattering factors.

Barbara Olech, Petr Brázda, Lukas Palatinus, Paulina Maria Dominiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From atoms to a data bank: optimizing transferability of electron-density symmetry.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Measurement of atomic scattering factors by cryoelectron microscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Journal of applied crystallography · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 3D ED/MicroED entering a new era.Acta crystallographica. Section C, Structural chemistry · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbara OlechBiological and Chemical Research Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Petr BrázdaInstitute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 1999/2, 182 00 Prague, Czechia.
Lukas PalatinusInstitute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 1999/2, 182 00 Prague, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-8987-8164
Paulina Maria DominiakBiological and Chemical Research Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1466-1243

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 21-44862LNarodowe Centrum Nauki 2020/39/I/ST4/02904the Polish high-performance computing infrastructure PLGrid PLG/2021/014598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamical refinement is a well established method for refining crystal structures against 3D electron diffraction (ED) data and its benefits have been discussed in the literature [Palatinus, Petříček & Corrêa, (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 235-244; Palatinus, Corrêa et al. (2015). Acta Cryst. B71, 740-751]. However, until now, dynamical refinements have only been conducted using the independent atom model (IAM). Recent research has shown that a more accurate description can be achieved by applying the transferable aspherical atom model (TAAM), but this has been limited only to kinematical refinements [Gruza et al. (2020). Acta Cryst. A76, 92-109; Jha et al. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1234-1243]. In this study, we combine dynamical refinement with TAAM for the crystal structure of 1-methyluracil, using data from precession ED. Our results show that this approach improves the residual Fourier electrostatic potential and refinement figures of merit. Furthermore, it leads to systematic changes in the atomic displacement parameters of all atoms and the positions of hydrogen atoms. We found that the refinement results are sensitive to the parameters used in the TAAM modelling process. Though our results show that TAAM offers superior performance compared with IAM in all cases, they also show that TAAM parameters obtained by periodic DFT calculations on the refined structure are superior to the TAAM parameters from the UBDB/MATTS database. It appears that multipolar parameters transferred from the database may not be sufficiently accurate to provide a satisfactory description of all details of the electrostatic potential probed by the 3D ED experiment.

Indexed as

3D electron diffractiondynamical refinementelectron crystallographymicrocrystal electron diffractionmultipolar scattering factorsquantum crystallographytransferable aspherical atom model

Identifiers

PMID38512772
PMCPMC11067749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.