Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512679›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Detecting and Validating MAPT Mutations in Neurodegeneration Patients and Analysis of Exon Splicing Consequences.

Carol Dobson-Stone, Boris Guennewig, Hamish Mundell, John B Kwok

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carol Dobson-StoneBrain and Mind Centre and School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. carol.dobson-stone@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-2211-0257
Boris GuennewigBrain and Mind Centre and School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Hamish MundellNew South Wales Brain Tissue Resource Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
John B KwokBrain and Mind Centre and School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation of MAPT has been observed in patients with parkinsonism, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration and is a significant cause of frontotemporal dementia. In this chapter, we discuss considerations for next-generation sequencing analysis to identify MAPT mutations in patient genomic DNA and describe the validation of these mutations by Sanger sequencing. One of the most common effects of MAPT mutations is differential splicing of exon 10, which leads to an imbalance in the proportion of 3-repeat and 4-repeat tau isoforms. We describe how to investigate the effect of novel DNA variants on the splicing efficiency of this exon in vitro using the exon-trapping technique, also known as the splicing reporter minigene assay.

Indexed as

Frontotemporal Dementiatau ProteinsDNAExonsHumansMutationRNA SplicingDNAMAPT protein, humantau ProteinsExon trappingHeterozygote detectionLong-read sequencingPolymerase chain reactionpSPL3Sanger sequencingSanger sequencingSplicing reporter minigene assayWhole exome sequencingWhole exome sequencing (WES)Whole genome sequencingWhole genome sequencing (WGS)

Identifiers

PMID38512679
OpenAlexW4393051248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.