Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512660›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Structural Flexibility of Tau in Its Interaction with Microtubules as Viewed by Site-Directed Spin Labeling EPR Spectroscopy.

Marlène Martinho, Diane Allegro, Emilien Etienne, Cynthia Lohberger, Alessio Bonucci, Valérie Belle, Pascale Barbier

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marlène MartinhoAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, BIP, Marseille, France. mmartinho@imm.cnrs.fr.
Diane AllegroAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Marseille, France.
Emilien EtienneAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, BIP, Marseille, France.
Cynthia LohbergerAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Marseille, France.
Alessio BonucciAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, BIP, Marseille, France.
Valérie BelleAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, BIP, Marseille, France.
Pascale BarbierAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Marseille, France. pascale.barbier@univ-amu.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRInstitut de Neurophysiopathologie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tau is a microtubule-associated protein that belongs to the Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs) family. IDPs or Intrinsically Disordered Regions (IDRs) play key roles in protein interaction networks and their dysfunctions are often related to severe diseases. Defined by their lack of stable secondary and tertiary structures in physiological conditions while being functional, these proteins use their inherent structural flexibility to adapt to and interact with various binding partners. Knowledges on the structural dynamics of IDPs and their different conformers are crucial to finely decipher fundamental biological processes controlled by mechanisms such as conformational adaptations or switches, induced fit, or conformational selection events. Different mechanisms of binding have been proposed: among them, the so-called folding-upon-binding in which the IDP adopts a certain conformation upon interacting with a partner protein, or the formation of a "fuzzy" complex in which the IDP partly keeps its dynamical character at the surface of its partner. The dynamical nature and physicochemical properties of unbound as well as bound IDPs make this class of proteins particularly difficult to characterize by classical bio-structural techniques and require specific approaches for the fine description of their inherent dynamics.Among other techniques, Site-Directed Spin Labeling combined with Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (SDSL-EPR) spectroscopy has gained much interest in this last decade for the study of IDPs. SDSL-EPR consists in grafting a paramagnetic label (mainly a nitroxide radical) at selected site(s) of the macromolecule under interest followed by its observation using and/or combining different EPR strategies. These nitroxide spin labels detected by continuous wave (cw) EPR spectroscopy are used as perfect reporters or "spy spins" of their local environment, being able to reveal structural transitions, folding/unfolding events, etc. Another approach is based on the measurement of inter-label distance distributions in the 1.5-8.0 nm range using pulsed dipolar EPR experiments, such as Double Electron-Electron Resonance (DEER) spectroscopy. The technique is then particularly well suited to study the behavior of Tau in its interaction with its physiological partner: microtubules (MTs). In this chapter we provide a detailed experimental protocol for the labeling of Tau protein and its EPR study while interacting with preformed (Paclitaxel-stabilized) MTs, or using Tau as MT inducer. We show how the choice of nitroxide label can be crucial to obtain functional information on Tau/tubulin complexes.

Indexed as

Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsNitrogen Oxidestau ProteinsElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyMicrotubulesSpin LabelsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsNitrogen OxidesnitroxylSpin Labelstau ProteinsElectron Paramagnetic ResonanceFuzzy complexIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsMicrotubulesNitroxide radicalSite-Directed Spin LabelingSpin labelsTau proteinTauproteinTubulin dimers

Identifiers

PMID38512660
OpenAlexW4393051828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.