Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512629›Full record

SynthesisLa Radiologia medica2024

Efficacy of radiofrequency in lumbar facet joint pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials.

Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini, Paula María Jiménez Gutiérrez, Fernando Ruiz Santiago

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in La Radiologia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06477094 (Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation Using Multi-Tined Electrodes vs. Traditional Electrodes for Treatment of Lumbar Spondylosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06477094 narecruitingnot on this map

Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation Using Multi-Tined Electrodes vs. Traditional Electrodes for Treatment of Lumbar Spondylosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArkansasRan2024 to 2027Enrolled25ConditionsLumbar SpondylosisArmsStratus Nimbus Electrosurgical RF Multi-Tined Expandable Electrode, Stryker Venom Radiofrequency Cannula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-BossiniDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves, Avda. Fuerzas Armadas, 18014, Granada, Spain. ajbossini@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0663-2856
Paula María Jiménez GutiérrezAdvanced Medical Imaging Group (TeCe22), Instituto Biosanitario de Granada (IBS.Granada), 18016, Granada, Spain.
Fernando Ruiz SantiagoDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves, Avda. Fuerzas Armadas, 18014, Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLumbar facet joint pain (LFJP) is one of the main causes of chronic low back pain (LBP) and can be treated using radiofrequency (RF) sensory denervation. The aim of this work is to analyze the efficacy of RF in LFJP through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with placebo control. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic search was conducted in the Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science databases, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The variables of interest were pain, functional status, quality of life (QoL), and global perceived effect (GPE) measured at different time intervals: short (< 3 months), medium (> 3 and < 12 months), and long term (> 12 months).

resultsEight RCTs with placebo control were included. RF showed significant benefits over placebo in pain relief in the short (MD - 1.01; 95% CI - 1.98 to -0.04; p = 0.04), medium (MD - 1.42; 95% CI - 2.41 to - 0.43; p = 0.005), and long term (MD - 1.12; 95% CI - 1.57 to - 0.68; p < 0.001), as well as improvement in functional disability in the short (SMD - 0.94; 95% CI - 1.73 to - 0.14; p = 0.02) and long term (SMD - 0.74; 95% CI - 1.09 to - 0.39; p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in QoL or quantitative GPE, but benefits for RF were observed in dichotomous GPE in the medium (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-0.52; p = 0.001) and long term (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.06-0.78; p = 0.02). Subgroup analyses showed more benefits for RF in LBP < 1 year in the short term and in RCTs that did not require performing an MRI for patient selection.

conclusionsRF demonstrated significant improvement in pain and functionality, but the benefits in terms of QoL and GPE are inconclusive. Future clinical trials should investigate the long-term effects of RF, its impact on quality of life, and define appropriate criteria for patient selection.

Indexed as

Low Back PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicZygapophyseal JointDenervationHumansLumbar VertebraePain MeasurementQuality of LifeRadiofrequency TherapyTreatment OutcomeFacet jointMeta-analysisPainPlaceboRadiofrequencyRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID38512629
OpenAlexW4393041756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.