Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512594›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Narrative medicine interventions for oncology clinicians: a systematic review.

Trisha K Paul, Yashaswi Reddy, Anthara Gnanakumar, Rebecca England, Alexandra Superdock, Dhatri Malipeddi, Jordan Wrigley, Erin Reardon, Meaghann S Weaver, Erica C Kaye

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Narrative medicine in patients with cancer during intravenous antiblastic therapy: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The healing promise of narrative medicine in cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Narrative Medicine: A Clinical Tool for the Oncology Advanced Practitioner.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Trisha K PaulDepartment of Oncology, Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Mail Stop 260, Memphis, TN, USA. trisha.paul@stjude.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5666-5787
Yashaswi ReddyKakatiya Medical College, Warangal, Telangana, India.
Anthara GnanakumarGeorge Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Rebecca EnglandUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Alexandra SuperdockDepartment of Oncology, Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Mail Stop 260, Memphis, TN, USA.
Dhatri MalipeddiRochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.
Jordan WrigleyDepartment of Oncology, Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Mail Stop 260, Memphis, TN, USA.
Erin ReardonEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Meaghann S WeaverUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Erica C KayeDepartment of Oncology, Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Mail Stop 260, Memphis, TN, USA.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USEmory University · USGeorge Washington University · USKakatiya University · INRochester General Hospital · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

IMPROVING PROGNOSTIC COMMUNICATION IN PEDIATRIC CANCERK08CA266935 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Erica Carmen Kaye · 2022 to 2026
$1.0M
Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute K08CA266935NCI NIH HHS K08 CA266935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs narrative medicine interventions are integrated increasingly into medical practice, growing evidence indicates benefits for healthcare professionals. Presently, the prevalence and impact of narrative medicine interventions in the field of oncology remain unknown. This systematic review synthesizes published data on narrative medicine interventions in oncology and reports current knowledge on feasibility, acceptability, and impact on cancer care professionals.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception through February 2024. Eligible articles were published in English and contained original data on feasibility, acceptability, and/or impact of a narrative medicine intervention for oncology professionals. Database searches identified 2614 deduplicated articles, from which 50 articles were identified for full-text assessment and 11 articles met inclusion criteria. Two additional articles were identified through manual review of references.

resultsThirteen articles described 12 unique narrative medicine interventions targeting cancer care professionals. All studies described their respective interventions as feasible, acceptable, and impactful for participants. Interventions involved writing, reading, reflection, and other narrative-based strategies. Standardized validated tools evaluated outcomes including burnout, empathy expression, secondary trauma, quality of humanistic care, and well-being. Participants reported appreciation of opportunities for reflection, perspective sharing, and bearing witness, which they perceived to strengthen wellness and community.

conclusionNarrative medicine interventions are feasible and acceptable and may bolster oncology clinicians' functioning across domains. Multi-site, prospective, randomized studies are needed to investigate the broader impact of narrative medicine interventions and advance the science of narrative medicine in oncology.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: CRD42022369432.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyNarrative MedicineBurnout, ProfessionalEmpathyHealth PersonnelHumansNeoplasmsCancerCliniciansNarrative medicineOncologyReflectionStorytelling

Identifiers

PMID38512594
PMCPMC11439222
OpenAlexW4393037437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.