Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512539›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Deep learning using contrast-enhanced ultrasound images to predict the nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Yun Bai, Zi-Chen An, Fan Li, Lian-Fang Du, Tian-Wu Xie, Xi-Peng Zhang, Ying-Yu Cai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. State of the art review of AI in renal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deep learning algorithm for pathological grading of renal cell carcinoma based on multi-phase enhanced CT.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yun Bai *Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 85/86 Wujin Road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Zi-Chen An *Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 85/86 Wujin Road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Fan LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 85/86 Wujin Road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Lian-Fang DuDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 85/86 Wujin Road, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Tian-Wu XieInstitute of Radiation Medicine, Fudan University, No. 2094 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. tianwuxie@fudan.edu.cn.
Xi-Peng ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Taiyuan Normal University, No. 319 Daxue Street, Taiyuan, 030619, China. zxp_2576@163.com.
Ying-Yu CaiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 85/86 Wujin Road, Shanghai, 200080, China. yingyu.cai@shgh.cn.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNFudan University · CNShanghai First People's Hospital · CNTaiyuan Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the effectiveness of a deep learning model using contrastenhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images in distinguishing between low-grade (grade I and II) and high-grade (grade III and IV) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

methodsA retrospective study was conducted using CEUS images of 177 Fuhrmangraded ccRCCs (93 low-grade and 84 high-grade) from May 2017 to December 2020. A total of 6412 CEUS images were captured from the videos and normalized for subsequent analysis. A deep learning model using the RepVGG architecture was proposed to differentiate between low-grade and high-grade ccRCC. The model's performance was evaluated based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Class activation mapping (CAM) was used to visualize the specific areas that contribute to the model's predictions.

resultsFor discriminating high-grade ccRCC from low-grade, the deep learning model achieved a sensitivity of 74.8%, specificity of 79.1%, accuracy of 77.0%, and an AUC of 0.852 in the test set.

conclusionThe deep learning model based on CEUS images can accurately differentiate between low-grade and high-grade ccRCC in a non-invasive manner.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellDeep LearningKidney NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesROC CurveArtificial intelligenceClassificationContrast-enhanced ultrasoundDeep learningKidney neoplasmsNuclear grade

Identifiers

PMID38512539
OpenAlexW4393044004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.