Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512513›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024

Integrative analysis with machine learning identifies diagnostic and prognostic signatures in neuroblastoma based on differentially DNA methylated enhancers between INSS stage 4 and 4S neuroblastoma.

Shan Li, Tao Mi, Liming Jin, Yimeng Liu, Zhaoxia Zhang, Jinkui Wang, Xin Wu, Chunnian Ren, Zhaoying Wang, Xiangpan Kong and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shan LiDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Tao MiDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Liming JinDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Yimeng LiuDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Zhaoxia ZhangDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Jinkui WangDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Xin WuDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Chunnian RenDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Zhaoying WangDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Xiangpan KongDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Jiayan LiuDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Junyi LuoDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Dawei HeDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Zhongshan 2nd Road, No. 136, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China. hedawei@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn.
Chongqing Medical University · CNChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNChina International Science and Technology Cooperation · CN

Funding

Chongqing Municipal Science and Technology Bureau cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccumulating evidence demonstrates that aberrant methylation of enhancers is crucial in gene expression profiles across several cancers. However, the latent effect of differently expressed enhancers between INSS stage 4S and 4 neuroblastoma (NB) remains elusive.

methodsWe utilized the transcriptome and methylation data of stage 4S and 4 NB patients to perform Enhancer Linking by Methylation/Expression Relationships (ELMER) analysis, discovering a differently expressed motif within 67 enhancers between stage 4S and 4 NB. Harnessing the 67 motif genes, we established the INSS stage related signature (ISRS) by amalgamating 12 and 10 distinct machine learning (ML) algorithms across 113 and 101 ML combinations to precisely diagnose stage 4 NB among all NB patients and to predict the prognosis of NB patients. Based on risk scores calculated by prognostic ISRS, patients were categorized into high and low-risk groups according to median risk score. We conducted comprehensive comparisons between two risk groups, in terms of clinical applications, immune microenvironment, somatic mutations, immunotherapy, chemotherapy and single-cell analysis. Ultimately, we empirically validated the differential expressions of two ISRS model genes, CAMTA2 and FOXD1, through immunochemistry staining.

resultsThrough leave-one-out cross-validation, in both feature selection and model construction, we selected the random forest algorithm to diagnose stage 4 NB, and Enet algorithm to develop prognostic ISRS, due to their highest average C-index across five NB cohorts. After validations, the ISRS demonstrated a stable predictive capability, outperforming the previously published NB signatures and several clinic variables. We stratified NB patients into high and low-risk group based on median risk score, which showed the low-risk group with a superior survival outcome, an abundant immune infiltration, a decreased mutation landscape, and an enhanced sensitivity to immunotherapy. Single-cell analysis between two risk groups reveals biologically cellular variations underlying ISRS. Finally, we verified the significantly higher protein levels of CAMTA2 and FOXD1 in stage 4S NB, as well as their protective prognosis value in NB.

conclusionBased on multi-omics data and ML algorithms, we successfully developed the ISRS to enable accurate diagnosis and prognostic stratification in NB, which shed light on molecular mechanisms of spontaneous regression and clinical utilization of ISRS.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeuroblastomaCalcium-Binding ProteinsDNAForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansPrognosisRisk FactorsTrans-ActivatorsTumor MicroenvironmentCalcium-Binding ProteinsCAMTA2 protein, humanDNAForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXD1 protein, humanTrans-ActivatorsDNA methylationMachine learningNeuroblastomaPrognostic predictionSingle-cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID38512513
PMCPMC10957705
OpenAlexW4393039664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.