Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512511›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Treatment patterns and prognosis in patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-exposed high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a real-world data analysis.

Nobutaka Nishimura, Makito Miyake, Kota Iida, Tatsuki Miyamoto, Ryotaro Tomida, Kazuyuki Numakura, Junichi Inokuchi, Takahiro Yoneyama, Eijiro Okajima, Shugo Yajima and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Nobutaka NishimuraDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Makito MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan. makitomiyake@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9503-7356
Kota IidaDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Tatsuki MiyamotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Ryotaro TomidaDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, 160 Minamiumemoto-Machi Kou, Matsuyama, Ehime, 791-0280, Japan.
Kazuyuki NumakuraDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Junichi InokuchiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Takahiro YoneyamaDepartment of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Zaifucho, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
Eijiro OkajimaDepartment of Urology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, 897-5, Shichijo-Nishi Machi 2 Chome, Nara, 630-8581, Japan.
Shugo YajimaDivision of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Hitoshi MasudaDivision of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Naoki TeradaDepartment of Urology, Miyazaki University, 5200 Kihara Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan.
Rikiya TaokaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
Takashi KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takahiro KojimaDepartment of Urology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Kanokoden, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Yoshiyuki MatsuiDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Naotaka NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Hiroshi KitamuraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kiyohide FujimotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Nara Medical University · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPUniversity of Toyama · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPAkita University · JPHirosaki University · JPKagawa University · JPKyoto University · JPKyushu University · JPNara Prefecture General Medical CenterShikoku Cancer Center · JPTokyo National Hospital · JPUniversity of Miyazaki · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe International Bladder Cancer Group designated the subgroup that is resistant to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) but does not meet the criteria for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC as "BCG-exposed high-risk NMIBC" to guide optimal trial design. We aimed to investigate the treatment patterns and prognoses of patients with BCG-exposed NMIBC.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of 3283 patients who received intravesical BCG therapy for NMIBC at 14 participating institutions between January 2000 and December 2019. Patients meeting the criteria for BCG-exposed and BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, as defined by the Food and Drug Administration and International Bladder Cancer Group, were selected. To compare treatment patterns and outcomes, high-risk recurrence occurring more than 24 months after the last dose of BCG was defined as "BCG-treated NMIBC." In addition, we compared prognoses between BCG rechallenge and early cystectomy in patients with BCG-exposed NMIBC.

resultsOf 3283 patients, 108 (3.3%), 150 (4.6%), and 391 (11.9%) were classified as having BCG-exposed, unresponsive, and treated NMIBC, respectively. BCG-exposed NMIBC demonstrated intermediate survival curves for intravesical recurrence-free and progression-free survival, falling between those of BCG-unresponsive and treated NMIBC. Among patients with BCG-exposed NMIBC, 48 (44.4%) received BCG rechallenge, which was the most commonly performed treatment, and 19 (17.6%) underwent early cystectomy. No significant differences were observed between BCG rechallenge and early cystectomy in patients with BCG-exposed NMIBC.

conclusionsThe newly proposed definition of BCG-exposed NMIBC may serve as a valuable disease subgroup for distinguishing significant gray areas, except in cases of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

Indexed as

Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntravesicalBCG VaccineData AnalysisHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAdjuvants, ImmunologicBCG VaccineAdequate BCG therapyBCG-exposed NMIBCBCG-unresponsive NMIBCDelayed relapse after adequate BCGDelayed relapse after inadequate BCG

Identifiers

PMID38512511
OpenAlexW4393041981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.