ReviewCVIR endovascular2024
Dealing with complications in interventional radiology.
Review in CVIR endovascular, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous intrabiliary injection of gelatin sponge slurry for the management of acute hemobilia during biliary interventions: an alternative salvage technique.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
- Managing your life as an IR - perspective of a young IR.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
- Microwave ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma two case reports with literature review.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Cardiac Events After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Nation-Wide Cohort Study.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Preventing and Managing Tracheostomy-Related Emergencies in the Radiology Suite: Best Practices for Safety and Preparedness.Journal of radiology nursing · 2025Article
- Sterile gown and drape, and bouffant cap for thyroid FNA: preventing infections or producing unnecessary medical waste?Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Complications in interventional radiology: early detection and effective intervention strategies.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Review
- Advancements in Interventional Radiology for Managing Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is widely accepted that most misadventures, which lead to harm have not occurred because of a single individual but rather due to a failure of process that results in healthcare workers making mistakes. This failure of process and the pervasiveness of adverse events is just as prevalent in Interventional Radiology (IR) as it is in other specialities. The true prevalence and prevailing aetiology of complications in IR are not exactly known as there is a paucity of investigative literature into this area; especially when compared with other more established disciplines such as Surgery. Some IR procedures have a higher risk profile than others. However, published data suggests that many adverse events in IR are preventable (55-84%) and frequently involve a device related complication such as improper usage or malfunction. This article aims to discuss factors that contribute to complications in IR along with tools and strategies for dealing with them to achieve optimal patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.