Observational studyEuropean radiology2024
Long-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis.
Observational study in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of umbilical endometriosis: safety, feasibility, clinical, and imaging outcomes.European radiology · 2026Article
- Feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for abdominal wall endometriosis: preliminary results from a single center.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Insights into the Clinical Features, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Post-Surgical Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: A Retrospective Study [Letter].International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Insights Into the Clinical Features, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Post-Surgical Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: A Retrospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of venous malformation and fibro-adipose vascular anomaly: prognostic factors of clinical efficacy.European radiology · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoablation under local anesthesia: a promising treatment method for symptomatic adenomyosis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Image-guided cryoablation for uterine diseases: a systematic review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- Benign Soft Tissue Lesions Responsible for Pain: When and How Should the IR Intervene.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Review
- Percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis: a systematic literature review of safety and efficacy.Insights into imaging · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo retrospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE).
methodThe Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective observational review of 40 consecutive patients, of a median age of 37 years (interquartile range [IQR] 32-40 years), presenting with a total of 52 symptomatic AWE nodules. All patients underwent cryoablation between January 2013 and May 2022 with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Outcomes were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) that measured pain, as well as by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The pain-free survival rates were derived using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Adverse events were analyzed and graded using the classification system of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe.
resultsThe median follow-up time was 40.5 months (IQR 26.5-47.2 months). The median VAS score before cryoablation was 8 (IQR 7-9). Complete relief of symptoms was documented in 80% (32/40) of patients at 3 months after initial cryoablation and correlated with the absence of residual endometriosis nodules on MRI. The median pain-free survival rates were 89.2% [95% CI, 70.1-96.4%] at 36 months and 76.8% [95% CI, 55.3-83.8%] after 60 months. No patient or lesion characteristics were found to be prognostic of failure. No major adverse events or side effects were reported in long term.
conclusionCryoablation safely and effectively afforded long-term pain relief for patients with AWE nodules. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: AWE cryoablation was found to be safe and effective in the long-term. KEY POINTS: • Cryoablation is highly effective with 80% of patients experiencing complete relief of AWE symptoms after a single procedure. • Cryoablation is safe without long-term adverse events or side effects. • The median pain-free survival rates are 89.2% at 36 months and 76.8% at 60 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.