Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512483›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2024

Facilitating Effects of Reductive Soil Disinfestation on Soil Health and Physiological Properties of Panax ginseng.

Yu Zhan, Ergang Wang, Yi Zhou, Guixiang He, Pengyuan Lv, Lixiang Wang, Tingting Zhou, Xinyue Miao, Changbao Chen, Qiong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hybrid Whole-Genome Sequencing ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yu ZhanJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, China.
Ergang WangJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, China.
Yi ZhouSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, China.
Guixiang HeJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, China.
Pengyuan LvJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, China.
Lixiang WangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, China.
Tingting ZhouJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, China.
Xinyue MiaoJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, China.
Changbao ChenJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, China. ccb2021@126.com.
Qiong LiJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, 130117, China. wode17k@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical soil fumigation (CSF) and reductive soil disinfestation (RSD) have been proven to be effective agricultural strategies to improve soil quality, restructure microbial communities, and promote plant growth in soil degradation remediation. However, it is still unclear how RSD and CSF ensure soil and plant health by altering fungal communities. Field experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of CSF with chloropicrin, and RSD with animal feces on soil properties, fungal communities and functional composition, and plant physiological characteristics were evaluated. Results showed that RSD and CSF treatment improved soil properties, restructured fungal community composition and structure, enhanced fungal interactions and functions, and facilitated plant growth. There was a significant increase in OM, AN, and AP contents in the soil with both CSF and RSD treatments compared to CK. Meanwhile, compared with CK and CSF, RSD treatment significantly increased biocontrol Chaetomium relative abundance while reducing pathogenic Neonectria relative abundance, indicating that RSD has strong inhibition potential. Furthermore, the microbial network of RSD treatment was more complex and interconnected, and the functions of plant pathogens, and animal pathogen were decreased. Importantly, RSD treatment significantly increased plant SOD, CAT, POD activity, SP, Ca, Zn content, and decreased MDA, ABA, Mg, K, and Fe content. In summary, RSD treatment is more effective than CSF treatment, by stimulating the proliferation of probiotic communities to further enhance soil health and plant disease resistance.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMycobiomePanaxAgricultureSoilSoil MicrobiologySoilFungal communityPanax ginsengPhysiological propertiesSoil disinfestationSoil health

Identifiers

PMID38512483
PMCPMC10957680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.