ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Extended offset stems are infrequently required in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty and low usage does not compromise stability.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionExtended offset (EO) stems are commonly used in posterior approach (PA) total hip arthroplasty (THA), but usage rates and complications are not well studied with anterior approach (AA) THA. This study evaluated usage rates, radiographic outcomes and complications following AA THA between patients receiving EO stems and a matched cohort receiving standard offset (SO) stems. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective review evaluated 1515 consecutive AA THA performed between 2014 and 2021. The recent 100 EO were included in radiographic and complication analysis and were matched to 100 SO stems based on stem size, procedure (unilateral/bilateral), sex, body mass index (BMI), and age. Data collection included patient demographics; pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements of leg length difference (LLD) and global hip offset difference (GHOD); and complications within 1 year. Independent t-tests and Chi-squared analyses compared EO and SO groups.
resultsEO was utilized in 8% of all AA THA. Despite matching procedures, the distribution of racial groups was different between EO and SO groups, respectively: Caucasian (75% vs. 43%), Asian (12% vs. 35%), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NHPI) (9% vs. 13%), and other (4% vs. 9%) (p < 0.001). No fractures, dislocations, or revisions occurred within 1 year after surgery in either group. One deep infection was noted in the SO group. The proportions of patients following surgery who had a GHOD < 6 mm (76% vs. 82%; p = 0.193) and LLD < 6 mm (81% vs. 86%; p = 0.223) were not significantly different between EO and SO groups, respectively.
conclusionsPrioritizing hip symmetry over stability results in a high proportion of patients achieving hip symmetry without high usage of EO stems in AA THA. Furthermore, low use of EO stems did not result in increased dislocations. Due to racial anatomical differences, Caucasian patients required EO stems to achieve hip symmetry more frequently than Asian and NHPI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38512461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.