Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512377›Full record

ArticleJournal of nephrology2024

The prognostic values of estimating intraperitoneal pressure in the occurrence of abdominal wall complications in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Tiantian Ma, Xinqiu Li, Jiayu Hao, Di Song, Hongyan Wang, Tianjiao Liu, Yaling Zhang, Nanzha Abi, Xiao Xu, Jie Dong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Tiantian Ma *Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xinqiu Li *Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.
Jiayu HaoKey Laboratory of Renal Disease, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.
Di SongKey Laboratory of Renal Disease, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.
Hongyan WangKey Laboratory of Renal Disease, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.
Tianjiao LiuKey Laboratory of Renal Disease, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.
Yaling ZhangKey Laboratory of Renal Disease, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.
Nanzha AbiKey Laboratory of Renal Disease, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xiao XuKey Laboratory of Renal Disease, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China.
Jie DongKey Laboratory of Renal Disease, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China. jie.dong@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-7298-3307
Peking University · CN

Funding

Capital Health Research and Development of Special Fund 2020-2-4079Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine 2019-I2M-5-046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased intraperitoneal pressure is associated with abdominal wall complications and technical failure of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Several equations have been developed to estimate intraperitoneal pressure. We aimed to assess the prognostic yield of the intraperitoneal pressure as estimated by current equations on the occurrence of abdominal wall complications in peritoneal dialysis patients.

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective cohort which recruited 1207 incident PD patients. Estimated intraperitoneal pressure was calculated using four available equations (according to Sigogne, Castellanos, Scanziani and de Jesus Ventura). Abdominal wall complications were recorded during follow-up. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis with competing risk regression were used to assess the predictive power of the estimates of intraperitoneal pressure in the occurrence of abdominal wall complications.

resultsDuring a median follow-up of 30 months, 66 (5.5%) patients (1.6/100 patient-years) developed abdominal wall complications. The median time to the occurrence of abdominal wall complications was 5.7 months. Only the estimated intraperitoneal pressure by the de Jesus Ventura equation significantly predicted abdominal wall complications by using univariate analyses. Associations between estimated intraperitoneal pressure by the de Jesus Ventura equation and the occurrence of abdominal wall complications disappeared after adjusting for significant clinical factors.

conclusionsWe verified the prognostic value of estimation of intraperitoneal pressure by four available equations in predicting abdominal wall complications in our single-center PD cohort. Due to a low diagnostic yield, a novel equation for estimating the intraperitoneal pressure is urgently needed.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallPeritoneal DialysisPressureAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsAbdominal wall complicationsIntraperitoneal pressurePeritoneal dialysisPrognostic value

Identifiers

PMID38512377
OpenAlexW4393041093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.