Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512356›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2024

Integrated plasma proteomics identifies tuberculosis-specific diagnostic biomarkers.

Hannah F Schiff, Naomi F Walker, Cesar Ugarte-Gil, Marc Tebruegge, Antigoni Manousopoulou, Spiros D Garbis, Salah Mansour, Pak Ho Michael Wong, Gabrielle Rockett, Paolo Piazza and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Future Research Directions on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Proteins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Hannah F SchiffNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Naomi F WalkerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Cesar Ugarte-GilInstituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Marc TebrueggeDepartment of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Antigoni ManousopoulouProteas Bioanalytics, The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA.
Spiros D GarbisNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Salah MansourNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Pak Ho Michael WongCentre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Gabrielle RockettCentre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Paolo PiazzaCentre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mahesan NiranjanInstitute for Life Sciences, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Andres F VallejoNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Christopher H WoelkVerge Genomics, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Robert J WilkinsonCentre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, and.
Liku B TezeraNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Diana Garay-BaqueroNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Paul ElkingtonNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Centre for Life · GBCentre for Human Genetics · GBUCLA Medical Center · USLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Cancer Research UK (CC2112)Clinical Lectureship / UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)Fogarty International Center NIH D43TW00976301Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/R001065/1MRC MR/P023754/1MRC MR/S024220/1MRC MR/W025728/1NIHR Biomedical Research Centre of Imperial College NHSUK MRC and the UK Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) EDCTP2UKRI-MRC CC2112)Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (094000)Wellcome Trust (203135)Wellcome Trust CC2112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDNovel biomarkers to identify infectious patients transmitting Mycobacterium tuberculosis are urgently needed to control the global tuberculosis (TB) pandemic. We hypothesized that proteins released into the plasma in active pulmonary TB are clinically useful biomarkers to distinguish TB cases from healthy individuals and patients with other respiratory infections.METHODSWe applied a highly sensitive non-depletion tandem mass spectrometry discovery approach to investigate plasma protein expression in pulmonary TB cases compared to healthy controls in South African and Peruvian cohorts. Bioinformatic analysis using linear modeling and network correlation analyses identified 118 differentially expressed proteins, significant through 3 complementary analytical pipelines. Candidate biomarkers were subsequently analyzed in 2 validation cohorts of differing ethnicity using antibody-based proximity extension assays.RESULTSTB-specific host biomarkers were confirmed. A 6-protein diagnostic panel, comprising FETUB, FCGR3B, LRG1, SELL, CD14, and ADA2, differentiated patients with pulmonary TB from healthy controls and patients with other respiratory infections with high sensitivity and specificity in both cohorts.CONCLUSIONThis biomarker panel exceeds the World Health Organization Target Product Profile specificity criteria for a triage test for TB. The new biomarkers have potential for further development as near-patient TB screening assays, thereby helping to close the case-detection gap that fuels the global pandemic.FUNDINGMedical Research Council (MRC) (MR/R001065/1, MR/S024220/1, MR/P023754/1, and MR/W025728/1); the MRC and the UK Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office; the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR); the Wellcome Trust (094000, 203135, and CC2112); Starter Grant for Clinical Lecturers (Academy of Medical Sciences UK); the British Infection Association; the Program for Advanced Research Capacities for AIDS in Peru at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (D43TW00976301) from the Fogarty International Center at the US NIH; the UK Technology Strategy Board/Innovate UK (101556); the Francis Crick Institute, which receives funding from UKRI-MRC (CC2112); Cancer Research UK (CC2112); and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre of Imperial College NHS.

Indexed as

BiomarkersProteomicsTuberculosis, PulmonaryAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisPeruSensitivity and SpecificitySouth AfricaBiomarkersDiagnosticsInfectious diseaseProteomicsPulmonologyTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID38512356
PMCPMC11141874
OpenAlexW4393037281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.