ArticleJCI insight2024
Integrated plasma proteomics identifies tuberculosis-specific diagnostic biomarkers.
Article in JCI insight, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Platelet-leucocyte interactions drive MMP-mediated tissue damage in tuberculosis.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary tuberculosis: a bibliometric analysis (2011-2025) with narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Identification of discriminative plasma protein biomarkers for recent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: a pilot data‑independent acquisition mass spectrometry‑based proteomics study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Revealing the multiple faces of LRG1: gene expression, structure, function, and therapeutic potential.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Tuberculosis Diagnostic Methods: Clinical Applicability, Implementation Challenges, and Integrated Testing Strategies.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multicohort assessment of plasma metabolic signatures of tuberculosis disease in children: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Necro-mosaic: a lesion-aware framework for testing programmed cell-death-associated mechanisms in tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Host-response biomarkers for precision tuberculosis: from immune transcriptomic signatures to clinical risk stratification.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Future Research Directions on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Proteins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- A Year in Review on Tuberculosis and Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria Disease: A 2026 Update for Clinicians and Scientists.Pathogens & immunity · 2026Review
- Dominant negative ADA2 mutations cause ADA2 deficiency in heterozygous carriers.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Peripheral blood neutrophil proteomic profiling with transcriptomic data integration reveals biomarkers for tuberculosis infection diagnosis.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Review of the British Thoracic Society Winter Meeting 2024.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Article
- The Evolving Landscape of Host Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Tuberculosis.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Proteomic analysis of plasma unravels dynamic pathways and potential biomarkers indicating disease stages followingmSystems · 2025Article
- Multicohort assessment of plasma metabolic signatures of tuberculosis disease in children.Research square · 2025Article
- Plasma proteomics for biomarker discovery in childhood tuberculosis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Recent progress in tuberculosis diagnosis: insights into blood-based biomarkers and emerging technologies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Candidate serum protein biomarkers for active pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis in tuberculosis endemic settings.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- The disruptive role of LRG1 on the vasculature and perivascular microenvironment.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUNDNovel biomarkers to identify infectious patients transmitting Mycobacterium tuberculosis are urgently needed to control the global tuberculosis (TB) pandemic. We hypothesized that proteins released into the plasma in active pulmonary TB are clinically useful biomarkers to distinguish TB cases from healthy individuals and patients with other respiratory infections.METHODSWe applied a highly sensitive non-depletion tandem mass spectrometry discovery approach to investigate plasma protein expression in pulmonary TB cases compared to healthy controls in South African and Peruvian cohorts. Bioinformatic analysis using linear modeling and network correlation analyses identified 118 differentially expressed proteins, significant through 3 complementary analytical pipelines. Candidate biomarkers were subsequently analyzed in 2 validation cohorts of differing ethnicity using antibody-based proximity extension assays.RESULTSTB-specific host biomarkers were confirmed. A 6-protein diagnostic panel, comprising FETUB, FCGR3B, LRG1, SELL, CD14, and ADA2, differentiated patients with pulmonary TB from healthy controls and patients with other respiratory infections with high sensitivity and specificity in both cohorts.CONCLUSIONThis biomarker panel exceeds the World Health Organization Target Product Profile specificity criteria for a triage test for TB. The new biomarkers have potential for further development as near-patient TB screening assays, thereby helping to close the case-detection gap that fuels the global pandemic.FUNDINGMedical Research Council (MRC) (MR/R001065/1, MR/S024220/1, MR/P023754/1, and MR/W025728/1); the MRC and the UK Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office; the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR); the Wellcome Trust (094000, 203135, and CC2112); Starter Grant for Clinical Lecturers (Academy of Medical Sciences UK); the British Infection Association; the Program for Advanced Research Capacities for AIDS in Peru at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (D43TW00976301) from the Fogarty International Center at the US NIH; the UK Technology Strategy Board/Innovate UK (101556); the Francis Crick Institute, which receives funding from UKRI-MRC (CC2112); Cancer Research UK (CC2112); and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre of Imperial College NHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.