Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512256›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Perceived Economic Burden, Mortality, and Health Status in Patients With Heart Failure.

Yuan Yu, Jiamin Liu, Lihua Zhang, Runqing Ji, Xiaoming Su, Zhiping Gao, Shuang Xia, Jing Li, Liwen Li

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuan YuDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Jiamin LiuNational Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lihua ZhangNational Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Runqing JiNational Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaoming SuNational Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhiping GaoDepartment of General Practice, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Shuang XiaDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Jing LiNational Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Liwen LiDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In the face of an emerging heart failure (HF) epidemic, describing the association between perceived economic burden (PEB) and health care outcomes is an important step toward more equitable and achievable care. Objectives: To examine the association between PEB and risk of 1-year clinical outcomes and HF-specific health status in patients with acute decompensated HF. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multicenter, hospital-based cohort study prospectively enrolled adult patients hospitalized for acute decompensated HF at 52 hospitals in China from August 2016 to May 2018, with 1-year follow-up. Data were analyzed on June 17, 2022. Exposure: Perceived economic burden, categorized as severe (cannot undertake expenses), moderate (can almost undertake expenses), or little (can easily undertake expenses). Main Outcomes and Measures: The clinical outcomes of the study were 1-year all-cause death and rehospitalization for HF. Heart failure-specific health status was assessed by the 12-Item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). Results: Among 3386 patients, median age was 67 years (IQR, 58-75 years) and 2116 (62.5%) were men. Of these patients, 404 (11.9%) had severe PEB; 2021 (59.7%), moderate PEB; and 961 (28.4%), little PEB. Compared with patients with little PEB, those with severe PEB had increased risk of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% CI, 1.21-2.13; P < .001) but not 1-year HF rehospitalization (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.98-1.49; P = .07). The mean (SD) adjusted KCCQ-12 score was lowest in patients with severe PEB and highest in patients with little PEB at baseline (40.0 [1.7] and 50.2 [1.0] points, respectively; P < .001) and at each visit (eg, 12 months: 61.5 [1.6] and 75.5 [0.9] points respectively; P < .001). Patients reporting severe PEB had a clinically significant lower 1-year KCCQ-12 score compared with those reporting little PEB (mean difference, -11.3 points; 95% CI, -14.9 to -7.6 points; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with acute decompensated HF, greater PEB was associated with higher risk of mortality and poorer health status but not with risk of HF rehospitalization. The findings suggest that PEB may serve as a convenient tool for risk estimation and as a potential target for quality-improvement interventions for patients with HF.

Indexed as

Financial StressHeart FailureAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansInpatientsMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38512256
PMCPMC10958235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.