Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512118›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2024

How effective is simple mechanical wound debridement in reducing bacterial colonisation? Results of a prospective clinical study.

Maurice Moelleken, Sebastian Heinrich Krimphove, Frederik Krefting, Sven Benson, Christos Rammos, Anna Ewa Cyrek, Joachim Dissemond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. S1 Guideline on Infected Interdigital Intertrigo (also called Gram-Negative Toe Web Infection).Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. A Scoping Review of Fluorescence Imaging: A Promising New Technology for Bacterial Detection in Burn Wounds.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Systematics, diagnosis and treatment of wound infections in chronic wounds: A position paper from WundDACH.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Review
  7. Approach to the Atypical Wound.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maurice MoellekenDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5517-8696
Sebastian Heinrich KrimphoveDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Frederik KreftingDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Sven BensonUniversity Hospital of Essen, Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology, Institute of Medical Education, Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4487-4258
Christos RammosDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Anna Ewa CyrekDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5611-809X
Joachim DissemondDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3893-328X
Essen University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsBacteria in wounds can lead to stagnation of wound healing as well as to local or even systemic wound infections up to potentially lethal sepsis. Consequently, the bacterial load should be reduced as part of wound treatment. Therefore, the efficacy of simple mechanical wound debridement should be investigated in terms of reducing bacterial colonisation. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with acute or chronic wounds were assessed for bacterial colonisation with a fluorescence camera before and after mechanical wound debridement with sterile cotton pads. If bacterial colonisation persisted, a second, targeted wound debridement was performed.

resultsA total of 151 patients, 68 (45.0%) men and 83 (55.0%) women were included in this study. The male mean age was 71.0 years and the female 65.1 years. By establishing a new analysis method for the image files, we could document that the bacterial colonised areas were distributed 21.9% on the wound surfaces, 60.5% on the wound edges (up to 0.5 cm) and 17.6% on the wound surroundings (up to 1.5 cm). One mechanical debridement achieved a significant reduction of bacterial colonised areas by an average of 29.6% in the wounds, 18.9% in the wound edges and 11.8% in the wound surroundings and was increased by performing it a second time.

conclusionsIt has been shown that even a simple mechanical debridement with cotton pads can significantly reduce bacterial colonisation without relevant side effects. In particular, the wound edges were the areas that were often most contaminated with bacteria and should be included in the debridement with special attention. Since bacteria remain in wounds after mechanical debridement, it cannot replace antimicrobial therapy strategies, but offer a complementary strategy to improve wound care. Thus, it could be shown that simple mechanical debridement is effective in reducing bacterial load and should be integrated into a therapeutic approach to wounds whenever appropriate.

Indexed as

SepsisWound HealingAgedBacterial LoadDebridementFemaleHumansMaleProspective Studiesautofluorescencebacterial wound colonisationfluorescence camerawound healingwounds

Identifiers

PMID38512118
PMCPMC10956538
OpenAlexW4393038206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.