Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38512000›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2024

The effect of psychiatric decision unit services on inpatient admissions and mental health presentations in emergency departments: an interrupted time series analysis from two cities and one rural area in England.

J G Smith, K Anderson, G Clarke, C Crowe, L P Goldsmith, H Jarman, S Johnson, J Lomani, D McDaid, A L Park and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

J G SmithPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6138-136X
K AndersonDepartment of Psychology, Middlesex University, London, UK.
G ClarkeImprovement Analytics Unit, The Health Foundation, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7249-0289
C CroweSunflowers Court Inpatient Unit, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Goodmayes Hospital, Ilford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-6883
L P GoldsmithPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6934-1925
H JarmanPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
S JohnsonNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
J LomaniNHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK.
D McDaidCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0744-2664
A L ParkCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
K TurnerPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
S GillardSchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
St George's, University of London · GBLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBCity, University of London · GBHealth Foundation · GBMental Health Research UK · GBMiddlesex University · GBNHS EnglandNorth East London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsHigh-quality evidence is lacking for the impact on healthcare utilisation of short-stay alternatives to psychiatric inpatient services for people experiencing acute and/or complex mental health crises (known in England as psychiatric decision units [PDUs]). We assessed the extent to which changes in psychiatric hospital and emergency department (ED) activity were explained by implementation of PDUs in England using a quasi-experimental approach.

methodsWe conducted an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis of weekly aggregated data pre- and post-PDU implementation in one rural and two urban sites using segmented regression, adjusting for temporal and seasonal trends. Primary outcomes were changes in the number of voluntary inpatient admissions to (acute) adult psychiatric wards and number of ED adult mental health-related attendances in the 24 months post-PDU implementation compared to that in the 24 months pre-PDU implementation.

resultsThe two PDUs (one urban and one rural) with longer (average) stays and high staff-to-patient ratios observed post-PDU decreases in the pattern of weekly voluntary psychiatric admissions relative to pre-PDU trend (Rural: -0.45%/week, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.78%, -0.12%; Urban: -0.49%/week, 95% CI = -0.73%, -0.25%); PDU implementation in each was associated with an estimated 35-38% reduction in total voluntary admissions in the post-PDU period. The (urban) PDU with the highest throughput, lowest staff-to-patient ratio and shortest average stay observed a 20% (-20.4%, CI = -29.7%, -10.0%) level reduction in mental health-related ED attendances post-PDU, although there was little impact on long-term trend. Pooled analyses across sites indicated a significant reduction in the number of voluntary admissions following PDU implementation (-16.6%, 95% CI = -23.9%, -8.5%) but no significant (long-term) trend change (-0.20%/week, 95% CI = -0.74%, 0.34%) and no short- (-2.8%, 95% CI = -19.3%, 17.0%) or long-term (0.08%/week, 95% CI = -0.13, 0.28%) effects on mental health-related ED attendances. Findings were largely unchanged in secondary (ITS) analyses that considered the introduction of other service initiatives in the study period.

conclusionsThe introduction of PDUs was associated with an immediate reduction of voluntary psychiatric inpatient admissions. The extent to which PDUs change long-term trends of voluntary psychiatric admissions or impact on psychiatric presentations at ED may be linked to their configuration. PDUs with a large capacity, short length of stay and low staff-to-patient ratio can positively impact ED mental health presentations, while PDUs with longer length of stay and higher staff-to-patient ratios have potential to reduce voluntary psychiatric admissions over an extended period. Taken as a whole, our analyses suggest that when establishing a PDU, consideration of the primary crisis-care need that underlies the creation of the unit is key.

Indexed as

InpatientsMental HealthAdultCitiesEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandHumansInterrupted Time Series Analysisemergency departmentsemergency psychiatryhealth service researchinpatient psychiatrypsychiatric services

Identifiers

PMID38512000
PMCPMC11362677
OpenAlexW4393039500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.