ArticlemBio2024
Proteins à la carte: riboproteogenomic exploration of bacterial N-terminal proteoform expression.
Article in mBio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Decoding Bacterial N-Terminal Proteoforms: Technologies, Challenges, and Functional Insights.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- TRAINSPOTTER: profiling nascent protein N-termini indicative of bacterial translation initiation via deformylation-assisted N-terminomics.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Guided tour through the small protein landscape ofmicroLife · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, it has become evident that the true complexity of bacterial proteomes remains underestimated. Gene annotation tools are known to propagate biases and overlook certain classes of truly expressed proteins, particularly proteoforms-protein isoforms arising from a single gene. Recent (re-)annotation efforts heavily rely on ribosome profiling by providing a direct readout of translation to fully describe bacterial proteomes. In this study, we employ a robust riboproteogenomic pipeline to conduct a systematic census of expressed N-terminal proteoform pairs, representing two isoforms encoded by a single gene raised by annotated and alternative translation initiation, in IMPORTANCE: With the emerging theme of genes within genes comprising the existence of alternative open reading frames (ORFs) generated by translation initiation at in-frame start codons, mechanisms that control the relative utilization of annotated and alternative TIS need to be unraveled and our molecular understanding of resulting proteoforms broadened. Utilizing complementary ribosome profiling strategies to map ORF boundaries, we uncovered dual-encoding ORFs generated by in-frame TIS usage in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.