Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38511827›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2024

Nursing rights in comics: educational technological innovation report.

Odilon Vieira Santos, Meiry Fernanda Pinto Okuno, Paula Hino, Mônica Taminato, Dulce Aparecida Barbosa, Hugo Fernandes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Odilon Vieira SantosUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3950-2204
Meiry Fernanda Pinto OkunoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-1186
Paula HinoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1408-196X
Mônica TaminatoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-2496
Dulce Aparecida BarbosaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-4446
Hugo FernandesUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2380-2914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto report an educational technology construction on nursing professionals' rights.

methodsan experience report on educational technology construction during the crediting of university extension hours in an undergraduate nursing course at a Brazilian public university, between March and June 2023. The Deming cycle was used as a procedural method.

resultsfour meetings were held between students and extension workers. Eight comic books were produced based on the Code of Ethics for Nurses, addressing professional autonomy, fair remuneration, risk-free work, denial of exposure in the media and others. The Deming cycle proved to be an important strategy for constructing products.

conclusionsnursing professionals' rights must be discussed and improved. Educational technologies, such as comic books, provide playful and reflective learning.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateStudents, NursingEducational StatusHumansInventionsLearning

Identifiers

PMID38511827
PMCPMC10946120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.