Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38511826›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2024

Nurses' workload during the COVID-19 pandemic: potential for experiences of moral distress.

Thallison Carlos Campos Santos, Gabriela da Costa Soares, Kelly Cristina Oliveira de Lima, Beatriz Bolognani Cardoso de Souza, Isabela Silva Câncio Velloso, Carolina da Silva Caram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thallison Carlos Campos SantosUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2390-3259
Gabriela da Costa SoaresUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9871-094X
Kelly Cristina Oliveira de LimaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4594-3841
Beatriz Bolognani Cardoso de SouzaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8527-6780
Isabela Silva Câncio VellosoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5408-0825
Carolina da Silva CaramUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6219-3301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto understand nurses' experiences of moral distress related to work overload during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.

methodsqualitative research, whose data collection occurred through individual interviews with 19 nurses who worked on the front line of COVID-19 in health services in southeastern Brazil. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.

resultswork overload proved to be a powerful source of experiences of moral distress due to excessive working hours during vaccination, double working hours, a troubled relationship due to pressure from managers and the population and physical and mental exhaustion, which prevented nurses from act according to their judgment. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: nurses' work overload reflects on quality patient care and prevents nurses from acting in accordance with their moral principles, generating moral distress in nurses.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesHumansMoralsPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkload

Identifiers

PMID38511826
PMCPMC10946119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.