ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2024
Prevalence of eating disorders in patients with celiac disease: a comparative study with healthy individuals.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Examining the Psychometric Evaluations of Disordered Eating Scales in Adults Living With Gastrointestinal Conditions.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Cultural Adaptation and Reliability Testing of the Coeliac Disease Food Attitudes and Behaviours Scale in Brazil.Nutrients · 2026Article
- [Dietary Restrictions in Celiac Disease: Differential Diagnosis Between Eating Disorders and Disordered Eating].Acta gastroenterologica LatinoamericanaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCeliac disease is a chronic immune-mediated disease, which is triggered and maintained by gluten in genetically susceptible individuals. Eating disorders are a persistent disturbance in eating-related behavior that results in altered food consumption or absorption and that significantly impairs physical health or psychosocial functioning.
objectiveThis study aimed at evaluating the prevalence of eating disorders in Brazilian celiac patients.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted as online survey including adult celiac patients who agreed to participate and a paired control health group. Questionnaires included questions about socioeconomic data and celiac disease diagnosis, and a validated questionnaire about eating disorders (Eating Attitudes Test-26.
resultsIn total, 741 responses were studied, with 484 from the celiac group and 257 from the control group. No significant difference was observed between the number of individuals at risk of developing eating disorder (p=0.39). Both groups showed a high risk of developing eating disorders (34.2% in the celiac group and 37.7% in the control group). Furthermore, among patients with celiac disease, we found higher scores on the Eating Attitudes Test-26 in those with depression (p=0.0013), those with living difficulty due to the disease (p<0.0001), and those dissatisfied with their weight (p<0.0001).
conclusionIn the sample analyzed, no greater risk of eating disorders was identified in patients with celiac disease compared with the control group. However, in general, about one-third of the respondents in each group had scores associated with the risk of eating disorders. Among celiac patients, depression, difficulties living with celiac disease, and being unhappy with one's weight were associated with higher risk for eating disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.