ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2024
Utilization of broad- versus narrow-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of outpatient community-acquired pneumonia among adults in the United States.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Safety of Different Antibiotic Regimens for the Treatment of Outpatient Community-Acquired Pneumonia Among Otherwise Healthy Adults.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo characterize antibiotic utilization for outpatient community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the United States.
methodsWe conducted a cohort study among adults 18-64 years diagnosed with outpatient CAP and a same-day guideline-recommended oral antibiotic fill in the MarketScan® Commercial Database (2008-2019). We excluded patients coded for chronic lung disease or immunosuppressive disease; recent hospitalization or frequent healthcare exposure (e.g., home wound care, patients with cancer); recent antibiotics; or recent infection. We characterized utilization of broad-spectrum antibiotics (respiratory fluoroquinolone, β-lactam + macrolide, β-lactam + doxycycline) versus narrow-spectrum antibiotics (macrolide, doxycycline) overall and by patient- and provider-level characteristics. Per 2007 IDSA/ATS guidelines, we stratified analyses by otherwise healthy patients and patients with comorbidities (coded for diabetes; chronic heart, liver, or renal disease; etc.).
resultsAmong 263 914 otherwise healthy CAP patients, 35% received broad-spectrum antibiotics (not recommended); among 37 161 CAP patients with comorbidities, 44% received broad-spectrum antibiotics (recommended). Ten-day antibiotic treatment durations were the most common for all antibiotic classes except macrolides. From 2008 to 2019, broad-spectrum antibiotic use substantially decreased from 45% to 19% in otherwise healthy patients (average annual percentage change [AAPC], -7.5% [95% CI -9.2%, -5.9%]), and from 55% to 29% in patients with comorbidities (AAPC, -5.8% [95% CI -8.8%, -2.6%]). In subgroup analyses, broad-spectrum antibiotic use varied by age, geographic region, provider specialty, and provider location.
conclusionsReal-world use of broad-spectrum antibiotics for outpatient CAP declined over time but remained common, irrespective of comorbidity status. Prolonged duration of therapy was common. Antimicrobial stewardship is needed to aid selection according to comorbidity status and to promote shorter courses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.