ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2023
Development and validation of heart failure-specific quality-of-life measurement tool in India.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a sensitive tool for assessment of quality of life (QoL) in heart failure (HF) patients in Indian settings. Methods: The authors conducted literature review, in depth interviews, clinical observations and designed the first draft of the QoL tool. The tool was validated using content and face validity by a panel of experts. For internal consistency reliability, the questionnaire was administered among 270 HF patients. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 20 HF patients. Principal component factor analysis with varimax rotation was employed to assess the dimensionality and to reduce the number of items. Cronbach's alpha, and Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were employed to investigate reliability of questionnaire. The responsiveness data were collected 6 months after the baseline data collection from 30 HF patients. IBM® SPSS® Statistics Version 21 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The principal component factor analysis revealed mainly 5 domains. The final tool included 25 items. Cronbach's alpha (α) for the overall tool was 0.915. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on test-retest was 0.734. The final tool showed good responsiveness to changes with a mean ± SD of the change in response of 46 ± 12.4 and a standardized mean response of 3.7 within six-months. Conclusion: The HF specific QoL tool developed for Indian patients is a valid and reliable instrument and it can be applied in daily clinical practice, and research. Short summary: We had developed and validated a quality-of-life tool for heart failure patients in India. This is the first ever attempt to develop a measure for heart failure patients in India. We had used a mixed methodology approach to identify all the domains in the tool. The newly developed tool is a valid, reliable, sensitive and responsive tool to measure quality of life in HF patients in India. This tool can be applied in daily clinical practice, research and health system for patients with HF in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.