ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2023
Sex-specific disparities in patients undergoing isolated CABG.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex Disparities in Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Direct CABG for Single-Vessel Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Sex impacts outcome in minimally invasive surgery of the ascending aorta: a propensity score matched analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Sex-specific differences in coronary blood flow dynamics during coronary artery bypass surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Coronary artery surgery outcome differences by sex.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study objective: Examine sex-specific characteristics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at our institution. Design: Retrospective chart review was performed utilizing our institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. Setting: An academic, quaternary care center from 2010 to 2021. Participants: 3163 females and 9573 males underwent isolated CABG. Interventions: The institutional STS database was queried for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables. Main outcome measures: Univariate comparisons between female and male groups were performed using chi-squared tests or fisher exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for 30-day mortality. Results: Females had more preoperative comorbidities than males, including hypertension, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, cerebrovascular disease, renal failure, and prior myocardial infarction. Females more frequently underwent urgent (61 % vs. 58 %) or emergent CABG (5.8 % vs. 4.3 %) compared to males ( Conclusion: Over the past decade, females undergoing CABG had more preoperative comorbidities, urgent and emergent operations, longer postoperative ICU stay and a higher risk of mortality than their male counterparts. Further studies must investigate these disparities to improve outcomes for females undergoing CABG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.