Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38511142›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024

A review on the impact of single-stranded library preparation on plasma cell-free diversity for cancer detection.

Jordan C Cheng, Neeti Swarup, David T W Wong, David Chia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan C ChengSchool of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Neeti SwarupSchool of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
David T W WongSchool of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
David ChiaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
University of California, Los Angeles · USStanford University · US

Funding

EFIRM Liquid Biopsy Research Laboratory: Early Lung Cancer AssessmentU01CA233370 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ABERLE, DENISE R., HSU, WILLIAM · 2018 to 2025
$8.0M
Cell-free DNA Analysis for Liquid Biopsy of CancerK00CA264398 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jordan C Cheng · 2023 to 2026
$389k
Predoctoral to Postdoctoral Research Training in ctDNA Biology for Liquid Biopsy of CancerF99CA264398 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHENG, JORDAN C · 2021 to 2022
$83k
NCI NIH HHS F99 CA264398NCI NIH HHS K00 CA264398NCI NIH HHS U01 CA233370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical oncology, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has shown immense potential in its ability to noninvasively detect cancer at various stages and monitor the progression of therapy. Despite the rapid improvements in cfDNA liquid biopsy approaches, achieving the required sensitivity to detect rare tumor-derived cfDNA still remains a challenge. For next-generation sequencing, the perceived presentation of cfDNA is strongly linked to the extraction and library preparation protocols. Conventional double-stranded DNA library preparation (dsDNA-LP) focuses on assessing ~167bp double-stranded mononucleosomal (mncfDNA) and its other oligonucleosomal cell-free DNA counterparts in plasma. However, dsDNA-LP methods fail to include short, single-stranded, or nicked DNA in the final library preparation, biasing the representation of the actual cfDNA populations in plasma. The emergence of single-stranded library preparation (ssDNA-LP) strategies over the past decade has now allowed these other populations of cfDNA to be studied from plasma. With the use of ssDNA-LP, single-stranded, nicked, and ultrashort cfDNA can be comprehensively assessed for its molecular characteristics and clinical potential. In this review, we overview the current literature on applications of ssDNA-LP on plasma cfDNA from a potential cancer liquid biopsy perspective. To this end, we discuss the molecular principles of single-stranded DNA adapter ligation, how library preparation contributes to the understanding of native cfDNA characteristics, and the potential for ssDNA-LP to improve the sensitivity of circulating tumor DNA detection. Additionally, we review the current literature on the newly reported species of plasma ultrashort single-stranded cell-free DNA plasma, which appear biologically distinct from mncfDNA. We conclude with a discussion of future perspectives of ssDNA-LP for liquid biopsy endeavors.

Indexed as

cell-free DNAfragment-sizeliquid biopsysingle-stranded library preparationultrashort single-stranded cell-free DNA

Identifiers

PMID38511142
PMCPMC10951391
OpenAlexW4392513904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.