Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38511105›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Lung Expansion Therapy for the Potential Populations: A Literature Review.

A Sankarganesh, Kumaresan Abathsagayam, Natesh Prabu Ravisankar, Nityal Kumar Alagingi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A SankarganeshDepartment of Physiotherapy, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, IND.
Kumaresan AbathsagayamDepartment of Physiotherapy, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, IND.
Natesh Prabu RavisankarDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, St John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, IND.
Nityal Kumar AlagingiDepartment of Physiotherapy, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secretion retention, atelectasis, and reduced lung compliance occur when endotracheal or tracheostomised patients cough ineffectively. There is a possibility of infection if the collapsed regions of the lungs are not reinflated. Therefore, to improve clinical outcomes, such as diaphragm mobility and thickness, lung volume, and thickness of the abdominal muscles, and decrease the length of hospitalizations, mechanical and manual techniques, such as balloon blowing exercises and incentive spirometer, are required. PubMed, Google Scholar, Pedro, Clinical Keys, Helinet, ProQuest, and Science Direct databases were used for the literature search considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The several manual and mechanical methods that were employed for lung expansion treatment for the potential populations are highlighted in this overview of the literature. Ten studies were considered in this review: five on balloon-blowing exercises, four on tracheostomy with incentive spirometry exercises, and one on incentive spirometry with balloon-blowing exercises. The effects were examined on individual outcomes that included rate of perceived exertion (RPE), diaphragm mobility, pulmonary function, volume of breath, length of hospitalization, and postoperative day complications. The structured protocols proved to be effective in improving lung expansion and pulmonary function for the potential population that involved healthy adults, noncritical COVID-19 adults, smokers, thoracotomy patients, and tracheostomised patients. The road to recovery is yet unexplored and underachieved because of the lack of evidence.

Indexed as

balloon-blowing exerciseincentive spirometerlung expansion therapypostoperative pulmonary complicationstracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID38511105
PMCPMC10954205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.