Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38511033›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2024

Practice of Tumor Bed Boost in Patients after Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Kaustav Talapatra, Garvit Chitkara, Sridevi Murali-Nanavati, Ajinkya Gupte, Nikhil S Bardeskar, Shruti Behal, Muzammil Shaikh, Pooja Atluri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaustav TalapatraNanavati Max Institute of Cancer Care, Nanavati Max Super Speciality Hospital, Mumbai, 400056 India.
Garvit ChitkaraNanavati Max Institute of Cancer Care, Nanavati Max Super Speciality Hospital, Mumbai, 400056 India.ORCID 0000-0001-8899-1061
Sridevi Murali-NanavatiNanavati Max Institute of Cancer Care, Nanavati Max Super Speciality Hospital, Mumbai, 400056 India.
Ajinkya GupteNanavati Max Institute of Cancer Care, Nanavati Max Super Speciality Hospital, Mumbai, 400056 India.
Nikhil S BardeskarNanavati Max Institute of Cancer Care, Nanavati Max Super Speciality Hospital, Mumbai, 400056 India.
Shruti BehalNanavati Max Institute of Cancer Care, Nanavati Max Super Speciality Hospital, Mumbai, 400056 India.
Muzammil ShaikhNanavati Max Institute of Cancer Care, Nanavati Max Super Speciality Hospital, Mumbai, 400056 India.
Pooja AtluriNanavati Max Institute of Cancer Care, Nanavati Max Super Speciality Hospital, Mumbai, 400056 India.
Dr. Balabhai Nanavati Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The practice of boost to the tumor bed after treatment with oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (BCS) remains variable. Using a survey, the present study evaluated the current practice of tumor bed boost administered in women after oncoplastic BCS. Actively practicing radiation oncologists across India were sent a questionnaire on the practice of adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy and tumor bed boost after oncoplastic BCS via email and encouraged to participate. Of the 54 radiation oncologists who participated, most (98.1%) used a linear accelerator for radiotherapy. Hypofractionation was preferred by 59.26%, standard fractionation by 7.41%, and the remaining selected the fractionation strategy based on various patient factors. In addition, 83.33% participants reported that they always planned tumor boost, 51.85% preferred photons for the boost, and 75.93% administered sequential boost. The most common dose for the boost was 12.5 Gy in five fractions (40.74%). Most participants (77.78%) revealed that they used a combination of methods for identifying the tumor bed. With respect to clip placement, most surgeons (96%) at the participants' centers placed ≥ 4 clips at the tumor site, with both the base and margins being preferred by surgeons (81.48%) for placement. Finally, 12.96% participants revealed that the surgeons always involved them during surgical planning, whereas 7.4% participants reported that they always included the surgeons during radiotherapy planning, suggesting that radiation oncologists and oncoplastic surgeons do not involve each other during surgical and radiotherapy planning, possibly leading to suboptimal treatment. This may be attributed to the absence of guidelines regarding boost practices after oncoplastic BCS.

Indexed as

BoostBreast cancerBreast-conserving surgeryOncoplasticRadiotherapyTumor bed

Identifiers

PMID38511033
PMCPMC10948658
OpenAlexW4387339453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.