Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38511024›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2024

Revisiting the Trans-Sacral Approach for Large Rectal Adenomas, Surgical Technique, and Oncological Outcome: a Case Series.

Sunil Saini, Sourabh Nandi, Anshika Arora, Madiwalesh Chhebbi, Chiranjit Mukherjee

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sunil SainiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, India.
Sourabh NandiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1439-8817
Anshika AroraDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, India.
Madiwalesh ChhebbiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, India.
Chiranjit MukherjeeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard oncologic surgeries for rectal carcinoma are radical trans abdominal procedures, However, these radical procedures are not suitable for large rectal adenomas. The transsacral approach for rectal adenoma was first described by Kraske and since then it has been utilized for various benign conditions of low and mid-rectum as well as for certain cancers. We are presenting a series of 5 consecutive cases of trans-sacral resection done in the past 7 years between January, 2016, until June, 2023, at the Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, HIMS Dehradun, for large mid- and lower rectal adenoma. There were 5 patients who underwent transsacral excision of rectal adenoma. Three patients were male and 2 were female. All the patients underwent surgery after confirming the diagnosis of adenoma and metastatic work up. The postoperative histopathological examination showed adenocarcinoma infiltrating submucosa (T1) in one patient; however, other 4 patients had adenoma reconfirmed. The transsacral approach may not be the method of choice for the rectal carcinoma but it is a very useful surgical alternative to the large rectal adenoma where there is no invasive component and which cannot be managed by any other methods.

Indexed as

Abdominoperineal resectionLow anterior resectionMinimal invasive rectal surgeryRectal adenomaTranssacral surgery

Identifiers

PMID38511024
PMCPMC10948643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.