Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510976›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

Decoding phenotypic screening: A comparative analysis of image representations.

Adriana Borowa, Dawid Rymarczyk, Marek Żyła, Maciej Kańdula, Ana Sánchez-Fernández, Krzysztof Rataj, Łukasz Struski, Jacek Tabor, Bartosz Zieliński

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adriana BorowaJagiellonian University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Kraków, Poland.
Dawid RymarczykJagiellonian University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Kraków, Poland.
Marek ŻyłaArdigen SA, Kraków, Poland.
Maciej KańdulaJanssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Ana Sánchez-FernándezJanssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Krzysztof RatajArdigen SA, Kraków, Poland.
Łukasz StruskiJagiellonian University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Kraków, Poland.
Jacek TaborJagiellonian University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Kraków, Poland.
Bartosz ZielińskiJagiellonian University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Kraków, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical imaging techniques such as high content screening (HCS) are valuable for drug discovery, but high costs limit their use to pharmaceutical companies. To address this issue, The JUMP-CP consortium released a massive open image dataset of chemical and genetic perturbations, providing a valuable resource for deep learning research. In this work, we aim to utilize the JUMP-CP dataset to develop a universal representation model for HCS data, mainly data generated using U2OS cells and CellPainting protocol, using supervised and self-supervised learning approaches. We propose an evaluation protocol that assesses their performance on mode of action and property prediction tasks using a popular phenotypic screening dataset. Results show that the self-supervised approach that uses data from multiple consortium partners provides representation that is more robust to batch effects whilst simultaneously achieving performance on par with standard approaches. Together with other conclusions, it provides recommendations on the training strategy of a representation model for HCS images.

Indexed as

Activity predictionDeep LearningHigh Content ScreeningImage representationSelf-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID38510976
PMCPMC10951426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.