ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2023
Trends in the incidence and in-patient outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: Insights from the national inpatient sample.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Due to Spontaneous Coronary Dissection in Pregnancy: A Case Report and Management Considerations.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Management of cardiopulmonary bypass in pregnancy: challenges and progress in maternal-fetal protection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Quality of cardiovascular care in 2024.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study objective: Pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality rates in the United States are rising despite advances in knowledge, technology, and healthcare delivery. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes, with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) being a potential contributor to the worse outcomes in pregnancy. Design/setting: We analyzed data from the national inpatient sample database to examine trends in the incidence and in-hospital outcomes of myocardial infarction in pregnancy from 2016 to 2020. Participants: Using ICD-10-CM codes, we identified all admissions from a pregnancy-related encounter with a diagnosis of type 1 AMI. Main outcome: Using the marginal effect of years, we assessed the trends in the incidence of AMI and utilized a multivariate logistic regression model to compare our secondary outcomes. Results: Of the 19,524,846 patients with an obstetric-related admission, 3605 (0.02 %) had a diagnosis of type 1 AMI. Overall, we observed an approximately 2-fold increase in the trend of AMI from 1.4 to 2.5 per 10,000 obstetric admissions, with the highest incidence trend of 2.5 to 5.2 per 10,000 obstetric admissions seen in Black patients. Among patients diagnosed with AMI, we found significantly higher rates of in-hospital mortality (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 22.9, 12.2-42.8), cardiogenic shock (AOR:54.3, 33.9-86.6), preeclampsia (AOR: 2.2, 1.65-2.94) and spontaneous abortion (AOR:6.3, 3.71-10.6). Conclusion: Over the 5-year period, we found increasing trends in the incidence of AMI in pregnancy, especially among Black patients. Incident AMI was also associated with worse pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.