Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510952›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2023

Association between number of vasopressors and mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Michael Sunnaa, Mina Kerolos, Max Ruge, Ahmad Gill, Jeanne M Du-Fay-de-Lavallaz, Perry Rabin, Joanne Michelle Dumlao Gomez, Kim Williams, Anupama Rao, Annabelle Santos Volgman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael SunnaaRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Mina KerolosRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Max RugeThomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Ahmad GillUniversity of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Jeanne M Du-Fay-de-LavallazRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Perry RabinRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Joanne Michelle Dumlao GomezRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Kim WilliamsRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Anupama RaoRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Annabelle Santos VolgmanRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Karolina MarinescuRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Tisha Marie SubocRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Rush University Medical Center · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study objective: Study the clinical outcomes associated with the number of concomitant vasopressors used in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Design: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients admitted with COVID-19 to the intensive care unit (ICU) between March and October 2020. Setting: Rush University Medical Center, United States. Participants: Adult patients at least 18 years old with COVID-19 with continuous infusion of any vasopressors were included. Main outcome measures: 60-day mortality in COVID-19 patients by the number of concurrent vasopressors received. Results: A total of 637 patients met our inclusion criteria, of whom 338 (53.1 %) required the support of at least one vasopressor. When compared to patients with no vasopressor requirement, those who required 1 vasopressor (V1) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.86-5.79, p < 0.01) (n = 137), 2 vasopressors (V2) (aOR 4.71, 95 % CI 2.54-8.77, p < 0.01) (n = 86), 3 vasopressors (V3) (aOR 26.2, 95 % CI 13.35-53.74 p < 0.01) (n = 74), and 4 or 5 vasopressors(V4-5) (aOR 106.38, 95 % CI 39.17-349.93, p < 0.01) (n = 41) were at increased risk of 60-day mortality. In-hospital mortality for patients who received no vasopressors was 6.7 %, 22.6 % for V1, 27.9 % for V2, 62.2 % for V3, and 78 % for V4-V5. Conclusion: Critically ill patients with COVID-19 requiring vasopressors were associated with significantly higher 60-day mortality.

Indexed as

60-day mortalityCOVID-19Intensive care unitShockVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID38510952
PMCPMC10946008
OpenAlexW4386807414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.