Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510946›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2024

Use of an upright power wheelchair in spinal cord injury: a case series.

Eunkyoung Hong, Michael Elliott, Stephen Kornfeld, Ann M Spungen

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eunkyoung HongSpinal Cord Damage Research Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.
Michael ElliottSpinal Cord Damage Research Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.
Stephen KornfeldSpinal Cord Damage Research Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.
Ann M SpungenSpinal Cord Damage Research Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJames J. Peters VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore independence, usability, and self-reported quality of life (QOL) in eligible persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) who used a standing powered wheelchair over a 12-week period. Setting: VA SCI research facility. Participants: Four participants with chronic SCI who use a wheelchair as the primary means of mobility. Intervention: A standing power wheelchair was used three times a week (3.5 h/session) for 12 weeks in a supervised setting. Main Outcome Measures: safety, usability and feasibility, blood pressure in seated and standing positions, bowel, bladder, and pain item banks from the SCI-QOL Physical-Medical-Health domain, and overall user satisfaction with the device. Results: Participants consistently maintained normal blood pressure responses between seated and standing positions throughout the training sessions and learned to perform all the mobility tasks safely and independently. Participants reported improvements on the SCI-QOL and were generally satisfied with the upright standing power wheelchair. Conclusions: In this small case series of chronic, non-ambulatory individuals with SCI, the standing powered wheelchair was shown to be safe and efficacious.

Indexed as

quality of lifesafetyspinal cord injurystanding power wheelchairtetraplegia, paraplegiausability

Identifiers

PMID38510946
PMCPMC10950945
OpenAlexW4392515138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.