Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510934›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

An inexpensive artificial snake hibernaculum built using readily available plumbing supplies.

Jonathan D Choquette, Lincoln M Savi, Corentin Fournier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan D ChoquetteSchool of Natural Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.
Lincoln M SaviWildlife Preservation Canada (WPC), 5420 Highway 6 N, Guelph, ON N1H 6J2, Canada.
Corentin FournierWildlife Preservation Canada (WPC), 5420 Highway 6 N, Guelph, ON N1H 6J2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial snake hibernacula are anthropogenic structures used by snakes in temperate zones to survive harsh winter conditions. Artificial hibernacula can be intentionally created for various purposes including herpetoculture, research, habitat enhancement and conservation, or to offset development impacts. Here we present a design for an artificial snake hibernaculum for research use that was convenient (manually installed) and cost-effective ($91 CAD ea.). The hibernaculum was made of HDPE and ABS plumbing hardware, and measured ∼160 cm long by ∼10 cm wide. Our design was multi-chambered, descended to the groundwater table, and was modelled after the burrowing crayfish burrows used as overwinter refugia by snakes in our study area. Installation was completed using a manual soil auger in areas with soil depths of ∼115 cm. Removable components would allow easy ingress and egress of snakes, and threaded caps would facilitate monitoring via borescope camera. Dataloggers were used in 4 unoccupied hibernacula during one hibernation period, and results demonstrated that hibernacula supported a low mean air temperature and a high mean relative humidity. The hibernacula also provided a substantial buffer against extreme outside temperature and humidity. Further testing may demonstrate the suitability of our hibernaculum design for herpetoculture or conservation purposes.•Installed using a manual soil auger in areas with soil depths of ∼115 cm•Removable components allow for safe and easy ingress/egress of wild-caught or captive-reared snakes•Removable cap and simplified shape facilitate health monitoring of snakes via borescope camera.

Indexed as

Artificial Snake Hibernaculum (ASH)HibernationLife zoneMassasaugaOverwinteringReintroductionResilience zoneTranslocation

Identifiers

PMID38510934
PMCPMC10950875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.