Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510922›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2023

An observational study assessing the use of Sirolimus-eluting balloons for side-branch treatment in the provisional stenting of coronary bifurcations.

Johanna Jones, Kyriacos Mouyis, Angelos Tyrlis, Krishnaraj S Rathod, Oliver Guttmann, Andrew Wragg, Constantinos O'Mahony, Anthony Mathur, Andreas Baumbach, Daniel A Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Non-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Bifurcation Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna JonesInterventional Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
Kyriacos MouyisInterventional Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
Angelos TyrlisInterventional Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
Krishnaraj S RathodInterventional Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
Oliver GuttmannInterventional Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
Andrew WraggInterventional Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
Constantinos O'MahonyInterventional Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
Anthony MathurInterventional Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
Andreas BaumbachInterventional Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
Daniel A JonesInterventional Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
St Bartholomew's Hospital · GBWilliam Harvey Research Institute · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drug eluting balloons (DEB) are a feasible method of rapid delivery of drug to a coronary vessel wall. Their efficacy has been established for the treatment of in-stent restenosis and small vessel disease but there is limited data for their use in bifurcation lesions. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of provisional upfront side-branch DEB use in bifurcation lesions compared to a simple balloon (POBA) or upfront 2 stent bifurcation strategy. Methods: We conducted an observational study of 625 patients undergoing PCI to bifurcation lesions. All the patients had a DES deployed in the main vessel (MV). Decision on revascularization option for the side branch (SB) was made by the operator. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure. Secondary endpoints were target vessel myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Results: 311 patients had upfront DEB to the SB whilst the remaining were treated with either DES (188) or POBA (126). Baseline characteristics were similar aside from history of previous MI, which were higher in patients treated with DES or POBA, p = 0.009 whereas patients with previous CABG were likely to undergo DEB treatment (p = 0.004). TVF was more likely to occur in the POBA group (7.5 %) compared to the DEB (3.3 %) and DES (3.3 %) groups (p = 0.0019). There was no significant difference in TV-MI (p = 0.62) or death (p = 0.98) between the groups. Conclusion: This study suggests that provisional bifurcation stenting with upfront Sirolimus DEB use in the SB is an effective treatment for non-LMS bifurcation PCI.

Indexed as

Coronary bifurcation lesionsDrug eluting balloonSide branch treatment

Identifiers

PMID38510922
PMCPMC10945945
OpenAlexW4376273711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.