ArticleCureus2024
The Importance of Differential Diagnosis in Splenogonadal Fusion: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Splenogonadal fusion is a rare, benign congenital malformation characterized by the association of splenic tissue and gonads (typically testicles). It is a condition of male predominance and can be classified into two types: continuous, if the spleen and gonad are united by a splenic cord or fibrous tissue, or discontinuous. Splenogonadal fusion is often associated with other congenital anomalies such as cryptorchidism, limb defects, and micrognathia. Differential diagnosis can be difficult and includes inguinal hernia, spermatic cord cyst, cryptorchidism, or testicular mass. Due to little knowledge of the pathology, unnecessary orchidectomies are often performed. A previously healthy five-year-old boy was sent to a pediatric surgery appointment due to testicular asymmetry. The physical examination showed a painless, nodular mass adhering to the upper pole of the left testicle, without any palpable inguinal masses. Tumor markers were negative, and a testicular ultrasound with Doppler revealed a mass suggestive of an accessory testicle. Left inguinal surgical exploration revealed the presence of a mass joined by fibrous tissue to the upper pole of the testicle, but no connection to the native spleen was found. Total excision was performed with the testicle's preservation. The anatomopathological analysis revealed morphological aspects compatible with splenic tissue with normal characteristics. The diagnosis of splenogonadal fusion is rare and complex, requires several differential diagnoses, and is often made intraoperatively.The prognosis is excellent as long as there are no associated malformations. A high level of suspicion for this pathology, with recognition of the anatomical structures, can avoid unnecessary orchidectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.