Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510828›Full record

ArticleArthropod-plant interactions2024

New grasslands promote pollination but not biological pest control in nearby arable fields in the short term.

Manuela Bürgler, Raja Imran Hussain, Bea Maas, Ronnie Walcher, Dominik Rabl, Bernhard Krautzer, Dietmar Moser, Thomas Frank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthropod-plant interactions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manuela BürglerInstitute of Zoology, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research (DIBB), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
Raja Imran HussainInstitute of Zoology, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research (DIBB), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
Bea MaasInstitute of Zoology, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research (DIBB), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
Ronnie WalcherInstitute of Zoology, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research (DIBB), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
Dominik RablInstitute of Zoology, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research (DIBB), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard KrautzerInstitute for Plant Production and Cultural Landscape, Department for Ecological Restoration, Agricultural Research and Education Centre Raumberg-Gumpenstein, Altirdning 11, 8952 Irdning-Donnersbachtal, Austria.
Dietmar MoserBiodiversity Dynamics and Conservation, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Thomas FrankInstitute of Zoology, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research (DIBB), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6377-719X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural intensification is a major threat to farmland biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. Semi-natural habitats are integral to the preservation of farmland biodiversity and ecosystem services, however, the extent in which they contribute to specific services is largely unclear. We studied predation rates of ground-dwelling predatory arthropods, and pollination success within old permanent grasslands, newly established grasslands and arable fields near and far from new grasslands. We evaluated whether grassland restoration can enhance pollination and biological control in crop fields. For this purpose, we established new grassland strips within cereal fields, which directly bordered existing permanent grasslands. We evaluated if the distance to these old and new grasslands affects the delivery of the two ecosystem services within crop fields. We found significantly higher seed numbers and seed weight in sentinel plants placed in old grasslands, new grasslands and nearby arable fields compared to distant arable fields. We also found significantly decreasing seed numbers and seed weight in sentinel plants placed in distant arable fields with increasing distance from old grasslands, while pollination success was not affected by distance in nearby arable fields. Contrary, we did not find any significant effects of new grasslands on biological control. Our study showed that 3 years after establishing grasslands arable fields benefited from the proximity of flower-rich new grasslands through increased pollination success though not regarding biological control. This indicates that, on a short term, establishing new grasslands can support beneficial arthropods in providing ecosystem services such as pollination. Predators, in contrast, might take longer to establish effective populations that denote higher predation rates. Our study provides a baseline for future long-term studies to better evaluate pollination and pest control patterns within arable fields. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11829-023-10034-5.

Indexed as

Distance effectEcosystem servicePollinatorPredatory arthropodSemi-natural grassland

Identifiers

PMID38510828
PMCPMC10948462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.