Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510784›Full record

ReviewJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2023

Effects of propofol intravenous general anesthesia and inhalational anesthesia on T-lymphocyte activity after breast cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.

Daqi Sun, Kunyue Li, Ziqi Chai, Lijuan Wang, Shimin Gu, Na Sun, Yu Zhang, Yuxia Wang, Tao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daqi SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Kunyue LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ziqi ChaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lijuan WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shimin GuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Na SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuxia WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Tao WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women. General anesthesia is a commonly used anesthesia method for breast cancer surgery, and studies have confirmed that general anesthesia can induce immunosuppression in breast cancer patients and increase the metastasis rate of tumors. However, the difference between the effects of intravenous general anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on the function of T-lymphocytes is still controversial, and it is necessary to explore reasonable anesthesia methods to reduce immunosuppression caused by surgery and anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Databases (Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang) were searched (up to October 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intraoperative inhalation anesthesia and propofol intravenous anesthesia in breast cancer patients, with the outcome of T-lymphocyte subsets. The meta-analysis was performed by STATA 14.0. Results: Six RCTs with 352 patients were included in the study. Compared with inhalation anesthesia, there was no difference in T-lymphocyte subsets between the two groups immediately after surgery, but the activities of CD4 Conclusion: There were no differences in the effects of propofol and inhalation anesthetics on T-lymphocytes immediately after surgery, but the inhibitory effects of inhalation anesthetics on CD4

Indexed as

Anesthesiabreast cancerpropofolT-lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID38510784
PMCPMC10953746
OpenAlexW4392024415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.