ArticleBrain & spine2024
Observational study of intracranial pressure instability in patients with pseudotumour cerebri syndrome.
Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A fixed CSF pressure (CSFp) of 25 cmH2O (18 mmHg) has been utilised to date to define and classify pseudotumour cerebri syndrome (PTCS). Furthermore, ICP monitoring, and CSF infusion tests have not been frequently performed in this group of patients. Research question: We aimed to report typical, unusual and unstable patterns of ICP in patients with PTCS. Material and methods: We reviewed the recordings of CSF infusion tests and overnight ICP monitoring of patients with suspected or confirmed IIH between January 2003-December 2020.We excluded all patients with a shunt in situ and selected recordings that represented unstable patterns of ICP changes in PTCS. Results: 463 CSF infusion tests and 26 ICP monitorings of PTCS patients had been performed in this timeframe. We divided results of observed pattern into two group: those with known venous sinus measurements (Group A) and those without (Group B). Observed recordings formed a total of 5 and 4 different patterns respectively, based on the behaviour of ICP and slow waves at rest, overnight, and during infusion as well as in relationship to the clinical presentation of each patient. Discussion and conclusion: Accurate monitoring of ICP in PTCS is quintessential. Full understanding of each element of its pathophysiology and their interaction would be essential and include quantification of the CSF pressure not only as a number, but also with consideration of its dynamic contents. Cerebral venous pressure measurements and/or monitoring may be useful. Consideration of the presence or absence of papilloedema in the context of disturbed CSF dynamics could reveal further diagnostic and therapeutic insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.