ArticleBrain & spine2024
Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series.
Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Posterior fossa dynamic craniotomy utilizing NuCrani reversibly expandable bone flap fixation plates: patient series.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Studies report rates of treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after craniotomy around 1-2%, but do not distinguish between supratentorial and posterior fossa operations. Reports about intracranial haemorrhages' temporal occurrence show conflicting results. Recommendations for duration of postoperative monitoring vary. Research question: To determine the rate, temporal pattern and clinical presentation of reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial posterior fossa haemorrhage. Material and methods: This retrospective case-series identified cases operated with posterior fossa craniotomy or craniectomy between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021 by an electronic search in the patient administrative database, and collected data about patient- and treatment-characteristics, postoperative monitoring, and the occurrence of haemorrhagic and other serious postoperative complications. Results: We included 62 (n = 34, 55% women) cases with mean age 48 (interquartile range 50) years operated for tumours (n = 34, 55%), Chiari malformations (n = 18, 29%), ischemic stroke (n = 6, 10%) and other lesions (n = 3, 5%). One (2%) 66-year-old woman who was a daily smoker operated with decompressive craniectomy and infarct resection, developed a reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after 25.5 h. In four (6%) cases, other serious complications requiring reoperation or transfer from the post anaesthesia care unit or regular bed wards to the intensive care unit occurred after 0.5, 6, 9 and 54 h, respectively. Discussion and conclusion: Treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage and other serious complications after posterior fossa craniotomies occur over a wide timespan and are difficult to capture with a standardized postoperative monitoring time. This indicates that the duration of monitoring should be individualized based on assessment of risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.