Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510599›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2024

Current state of the art of traditional and minimal invasive epilepsy surgery approaches.

Fabian Winter, Marie T Krueger, Daniel Delev, Tom Theys, Dirk Mp Van Roost, Kostas Fountas, Olaf E M G Schijns, Karl Roessler

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Fabian WinterDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Marie T KruegerDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Daniel DelevDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Tom TheysDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, UZ Leuven, Belgium.
Dirk Mp Van RoostDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Belgium.
Kostas FountasDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Thessaly, Greece.
Olaf E M G SchijnsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Karl RoesslerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATGhent University Hospital · BEMaastricht University · NLRWTH Aachen University · DEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Open resective surgery remains the main treatment modality for refractory epilepsy, but is often considered a last resort option due to its invasiveness. Research question: This manuscript aims to provide an overview on traditional as well as minimally invasive surgical approaches in modern state of the art epilepsy surgery. Materials and methods: This narrative review addresses both historical and contemporary as well as minimal invasive surgical approaches in epilepsy surgery. Peer-reviewed published articles were retrieved from PubMed and Scopus. Only articles written in English were considered for this work. A range of traditional and minimally invasive surgical approaches in epilepsy surgery were examined, and their respective advantages and disadvantages have been summarized. Results: The following approaches and techniques are discussed: minimally invasive diagnostics in epilepsy surgery, anterior temporal lobectomy, functional temporal lobectomy, selective amygdalohippocampectomy through a transsylvian, transcortical, or subtemporal approach, insulo-opercular corticectomies compared to laser interstitial thermal therapy, radiofrequency thermocoagulation, stereotactic radiosurgery, neuromodulation, high intensity focused ultrasound, and disconnection surgery including callosotomy, hemispherotomy, and subpial transections. Discussion and conclusion: Understanding the benefits and disadvantages of different surgical approaches and strategies in traditional and minimal invasive epilepsy surgery might improve the surgical decision tree, as not all procedures are appropriate for all patients.

Indexed as

Curative therapeutic approachEpilepsy surgeryMinimally invasive

Identifiers

PMID38510599
PMCPMC10951767
OpenAlexW4391283810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.