Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510592›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2024

Directional electrodes in deep brain stimulation: Results of a survey by the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS).

P Krauss, P Duarte-Batista, M G Hart, J M Avecillas-Chasin, M M Bercu, V Hvingelby, F Massey, L Ackermans, P L Kubben, N A van der Gaag and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

P KraussDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
P Duarte-BatistaNeurosurgery Department, North Lisbon University Hospital Centre, Lisbon, Portugal.
M G HartSt George's, University of London & St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences Research Centre, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom.
J M Avecillas-ChasinDepartment of Neurosurgery. University of Nebraska Medical Center. Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
M M BercuDepartment of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Corewell, USA.
V HvingelbyDepartment of Clinical Medicine - Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
F MasseyUnit of Neurosurgery, National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
L AckermansDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
P L KubbenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
N A van der GaagDepartment of Neurosurgery, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands.
M T KrügerUnit of Neurosurgery, National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
functional section of the EANS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Directional Leads (dLeads) represent a new technical tool in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), and a rapidly growing population of patients receive dLeads. Research question: The European Association of Neurosurgical Societies(EANS) functional neurosurgery Task Force on dLeads conducted a survey of DBS specialists in Europe to evaluate their use, applications, advantages, and disadvantages. Material and methods: EANS functional neurosurgery and European Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (ESSFN) members were asked to complete an online survey with 50 multiple-choice and open questions on their use of dLeads in clinical practice. Results: Forty-nine respondents from 16 countries participated in the survey (n = 38 neurosurgeons, n = 8 neurologists, n = 3 DBS nurses). Five had not used dLeads. All users reported that dLeads provided an advantage (n = 23 minor, n = 21 major). Most surgeons (n = 35) stated that trajectory planning does not differ when implanting dLeads or conventional leads. Most respondents selected dLeads for the ability to optimize stimulation parameters (n = 41). However, the majority (n = 24), regarded time-consuming programming as the main disadvantage of this technology. Innovations that were highly valued by most participants included full 3T MRI compatibility, remote programming, and closed loop technology. Discussion and conclusion: Directional leads are widely used by European DBS specialists. Despite challenges with programming time, users report that dLeads have had a positive impact and maintain an optimistic view of future technological advances.

Indexed as

DBSDeep brain stimulationDirectionalitydLeadsFuture technologiesSteeringSurvey

Identifiers

PMID38510592
PMCPMC10951785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.