Assessing muscular power in older adults: evaluating the predictive capacity of the 30-second chair rise test.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Effects of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation on Physical Function Adaptations to High-Intensity Interval Training in Older Adults.Nutrients · 2025
   Trial
2. Aging strong: an N = 1 mixed-methods study of long-term supervised high-intensity resistance training in a 71-year-old woman.Frontiers in aging · 2026
   Article
3. Longitudinal Cohort Study Investigating Fall Risk Across Diverse Muscle Health Statuses Among Older People in the Community.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025
   Article
4. Chair-Rising Power as Digital Biomarker: Validation against Jumping Power and Chair-Rising Time in Adults Aged 32-92 Years.Digital biomarkers
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as