ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Detecting bone lesions in X-ray under diverse acquisition conditions.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparative analysis of CNN-based deep learning architectures for early diagnosis of bone cancer using CT images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The diagnosis of primary bone tumors is challenging as the initial complaints are often non-specific. The early detection of bone cancer is crucial for a favorable prognosis. Incidentally, lesions may be found on radiographs obtained for other reasons. However, these early indications are often missed. We propose an automatic algorithm to detect bone lesions in conventional radiographs to facilitate early diagnosis. Detecting lesions in such radiographs is challenging. First, the prevalence of bone cancer is very low; any method must show high precision to avoid a prohibitive number of false alarms. Second, radiographs taken in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) or emergency departments (EDs) suffer from inherent diversity due to different X-ray machines, technicians, and imaging protocols. This diversity poses a major challenge to any automatic analysis method. Approach: We propose training an off-the-shelf object detection algorithm to detect lesions in radiographs. The novelty of our approach stems from a dedicated preprocessing stage that directly addresses the diversity of the data. The preprocessing consists of self-supervised region-of-interest detection using vision transformer (ViT), and a foreground-based histogram equalization for contrast enhancement to relevant regions only. Results: We evaluate our method via a retrospective study that analyzes bone tumors on radiographs acquired from January 2003 to December 2018 under diverse acquisition protocols. Our method obtains 82.43% sensitivity at a 1.5% false-positive rate and surpasses existing preprocessing methods. For lesion detection, our method achieves 82.5% accuracy and an IoU of 0.69. Conclusions: The proposed preprocessing method enables effectively coping with the inherent diversity of radiographs acquired in HMOs and EDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.