Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510535›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

Role of artificial intelligence in digital pathology for gynecological cancers.

Ya-Li Wang, Song Gao, Qian Xiao, Chen Li, Marcin Grzegorzek, Ying-Ying Zhang, Xiao-Han Li, Ye Kang, Fang-Hua Liu, Dong-Hui Huang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of gynecologic cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Histolytics: A panoptic spatial analysis framework for interpretable histopathology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ya-Li WangDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Song GaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qian XiaoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Chen LiMicroscopic Image and Medical Image Analysis Group, College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Marcin GrzegorzekInstitute for Medical Informatics, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Ying-Ying ZhangDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xiao-Han LiDepartment of Pathology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Ye KangDepartment of Pathology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Fang-Hua LiuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Dong-Hui HuangDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Ting-Ting GongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qi-Jun WuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
China Medical University · CNFourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University · CNNational Health and Family Planning Commission · CNNortheastern University · CNUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of cancer is typically based on histopathological sections or biopsies on glass slides. Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches have greatly enhanced our ability to extract quantitative information from digital histopathology images as a rapid growth in oncology data. Gynecological cancers are major diseases affecting women's health worldwide. They are characterized by high mortality and poor prognosis, underscoring the critical importance of early detection, treatment, and identification of prognostic factors. This review highlights the various clinical applications of AI in gynecological cancers using digitized histopathology slides. Particularly, deep learning models have shown promise in accurately diagnosing, classifying histopathological subtypes, and predicting treatment response and prognosis. Furthermore, the integration with transcriptomics, proteomics, and other multi-omics techniques can provide valuable insights into the molecular features of diseases. Despite the considerable potential of AI, substantial challenges remain. Further improvements in data acquisition and model optimization are required, and the exploration of broader clinical applications, such as the biomarker discovery, need to be explored.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningDigital pathologyGynecological cancersMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38510535
PMCPMC10951449
OpenAlexW4392661384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.