Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510458›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2024

Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study.

Dongwook Oh, Sung Yong Han, Sang Hyub Lee, Seong-Hun Kim, Woo Hyun Paik, Hyung-Ku Chon, Tae Jun Song, Se Woo Park, Jae Hee Cho

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomyEndoscopic ultrasound
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Dongwook OhDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Yong HanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Internal Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital and school of medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0256-9781
Sang Hyub LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2174-9726
Seong-Hun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Woo Hyun PaikDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyung-Ku ChonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, Republic of Korea.
Tae Jun SongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Se Woo ParkDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 7, Keunjaebong-gil, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do 18450, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-7468
Jae Hee ChoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonjuro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRUlsan College · KRHallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital · KRJeonbuk National University Hospital · KRPusan National University Hospital · KRWonkwang University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), classified as choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) and hepaticogastrostomy (HGS), is a feasible and effective alternative for distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, the preferred technique for better outcomes has not yet been evaluated. Objectives: We compared the long-term outcomes between the techniques. Design: Retrospective comparative study. Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-CDS or EUS-HGS with transmural stent placement for distal MBO between 2009 and 2022. The primary outcome was the stent patency. The secondary outcomes were technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs) of each technique, and independent risk factors for stent dysfunction. Results: In all, 115 patients were divided into EUS-CDS ( Conclusion: In distal MBO, EUS-CDS may be better than EUS-HGS with longer stent patency and fewer AEs. Furthermore, systematic treatment after EUS-BD is recommended for the improvement of stent patency.

Indexed as

biliary obstructioncholedochoduodenostomyendoscopic ultrasoundhepatico-gastrostomypatency

Identifiers

PMID38510458
PMCPMC10953094
OpenAlexW4392954478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.