Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510336›Full record

ReviewWorld neurosurgery: X2024

Emerging artificial intelligence-aided diagnosis and management methods for ischemic strokes and vascular occlusions: A comprehensive review.

G A U R I Parvathy, B A L A K R I S H N A N Kamaraj, B I K I K U M A R Sah, A A K A N S H R A H U L Maheshwari, A I S W A R I Y A A N N A Alexander, V I N D H E S H Dixit, H A S S A N Mumtaz, M U H A M M A D Saqib

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World neurosurgery: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Specialty-Level Overview of Emerging AI Trends.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

G A U R I ParvathyTBILISI STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, GEORGIA.
B A L A K R I S H N A N KamarajMADURAI MEDICAL COLLEGE, TAMIL NADU, INDIA.
B I K I K U M A R SahB.P. KOIRALA INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DHARAN, NEPAL.
A A K A N S H R A H U L MaheshwariPACIFIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, UDAIPUR, INDIA.
A I S W A R I Y A A N N A AlexanderTBILISI STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, GEORGIA.
V I N D H E S H DixitTBILISI STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, GEORGIA.
H A S S A N MumtazMAROOF INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL, ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN.
M U H A M M A D SaqibKHYBER MEDICAL COLLEGE, PESHAWAR, PAKISTAN.
Tbilisi State Medical University · GEB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences · NPKhyber Medical College · PKMadurai Medical College · INShifa International Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke is a promising field for the use of AI, especially machine learning (ML) because optimal results are highly dependent on timely diagnosis, communication, and treatment. In order to better understand the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) in relation to LVO strokes, its efficacy, and potential future applications, we searched relevant literature to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the topic. The databases PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were extensively searched for this review. Studies were then screened using title and abstract criteria and duplicate studies were excluded. By using pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria, it was decided whether or not to include full-text papers in the final analysis. The studies were analyzed, and the relevant information was retrieved. In recognizing LVO on computed tomography, ML approaches were very accurate. There is a shortage of AI applications for thrombectomy patient selection, despite the fact that certain research accurately evaluates individual patient eligibility for endovascular therapy. Machine learning algorithms may reasonably predict clinical and angiographic outcomes as well as associated factors. AI has shown promise in the diagnosis and treatment of people who have just suffered a stroke. However, the usefulness of AI in management and forecasting remains restricted, necessitating more studies into machine learning applications that can guide decision making in the future.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBrain IschemiaHemorrhagic strokeStrokeThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID38510336
PMCPMC10951088
OpenAlexW4392142284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.