Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510331›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Real-time Reconstruction of Comminuted Mandibular Fractures Using 3D Printing.

Dekel Shilo, Tal Capucha, Andrei Krasovsky, Ori Blanc, Omri Emodi, Amir Haze, Adi Rachmiel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07079111 (3D Printed Occlusal Splints for Intraoperative Use), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07079111 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

3D Printed Occlusal Splints for Intraoperative Use

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2026 to 2030Enrolled70ConditionsMalocclusion, Angle Class I, Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Malocclusion, Angle Class IIIArmsFormlabs 3D printed occlusal splint, Industry made occlusal splint
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dekel ShiloFrom the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Medical Care Center, Haifa, Israel.
Tal CapuchaFrom the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Medical Care Center, Haifa, Israel.
Andrei KrasovskyFrom the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Medical Care Center, Haifa, Israel.
Ori BlancFrom the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Medical Care Center, Haifa, Israel.
Omri EmodiFrom the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Medical Care Center, Haifa, Israel.
Amir HazeDepartment of Orthopedics, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Adi RachmielFrom the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Medical Care Center, Haifa, Israel.
Rambam Health Care Campus · ILTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILHadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Comminuted fractures of the jaws are complex injuries requiring special attention. In the past, treatment included closed reduction using maxillomandibular fixation. With advancements in technology and fixation systems, open reduction became a prevalent option. These fractures are difficult to reconstruct during the primary treatment phase, thus resulting in higher complication rates. The introduction of three-dimensional (3D) planning and printing brought about superior outcomes, yet these focus on secondary reconstruction due to the need for outsourcing planning and titanium printing. Methods: In this report, we describe real-time in-house 3D planning and printing using computer-assisted design software and a 3D-fused deposition printer for virtual reduction of the comminuted fractures and printing of the reconstructed mandible. Results: Following virtual 3D reduction, the newly created mandibles were 3D printed. The model was then used to preband a reconstruction plate, which in turn was used as a template during surgery for reducing the segments. The process of virtual reduction and printing should take a couple of hours at most. The results of five cases showed good alignment and proper function. Conclusion: Three-dimensional technology can be applied in the everyday primary care treatment protocol of comminuted fractures as an in-house tool which greatly improves both functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID38510331
PMCPMC10954053
OpenAlexW4393002840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.