Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38510253›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Case report: Rapid recovery after intrathecal rituximab administration in refractory anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: report of two cases.

Mahasen Reda, Rosette Jabbour, Asad Haydar, Fatima Jaafar, Nabil El Ayoubi, Omar Nawfal, Ahmad Beydoun

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Intrathecal treatment of Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor encephalitis: a promising approach for refractory cases.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahasen Reda *Department of Neurology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Rosette Jabbour *Division of Neurology, Saint George Hospital University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Asad HaydarDivision of Neurology, Saint George Hospital University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Fatima JaafarDepartment of Neurology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nabil El AyoubiDepartment of Neurology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Omar NawfalDepartment of Neurology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ahmad BeydounDepartment of Neurology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
American University of Beirut Medical Center · LBSaint George Hospital · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is one of the most prevalent etiologies of autoimmune encephalitis. Approximately 25% of anti-NMDAR encephalitis cases prove refractory to both first- and second-line treatments, posing a therapeutic dilemma due to the scarcity of evidence-based data for informed decision-making. Intravenous rituximab is commonly administered as a second-line agent; however, the efficacy of its intrathecal administration has rarely been reported. Case summary: We report two cases of severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis refractory to conventional therapies. These patients presented with acute-onset psychosis progressing to a fulminant picture of encephalitis manifesting with seizures, dyskinesia, and dysautonomia refractory to early initiation of first- and second-line therapeutic agents. Both patients received 25 mg of rituximab administered intrathecally, repeated weekly for a total of four doses, with no reported adverse effects. Improvement began 2-3 days after the first intrathecal administration, leading to a dramatic recovery in clinical status and functional performance. At the last follow-up of 6 months, both patients remain in remission without the need for maintenance immunosuppression. Conclusion: Our cases provide evidence supporting the intrathecal administration of rituximab as a therapeutic option for patients with refractory anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Considering the limited penetration of intravenous rituximab into the central nervous system, a plausible argument can be made favoring intrathecal administration as the preferred route or the simultaneous administration of intravenous and intrathecal rituximab. This proposition warrants thorough investigation in subsequent clinical trials.

Indexed as

Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor EncephalitisCentral Nervous SystemHumansReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRituximabSeizuresReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRituximabanti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptorcase reportencephalitisintrathecal rituximabrefractory

Identifiers

PMID38510253
PMCPMC10950913
OpenAlexW4392515386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.